2014
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of and predictors for withholding patient safety concerns among oncology staff: a survey study

Abstract: Speaking up about patient safety is vital to avoid errors reaching the patient and to improve a culture of safety. This study investigated the prevalence of non-speaking up despite concerns for safety and aimed to identify predictors for withholding voice among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in oncology. A self-administered questionnaire assessed safety concerns, speaking up beliefs and behaviours among nurses and doctors from nine oncology departments. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, about half of residents reported observing a safety threat during their most recent inpatient month, and about 70% spoke up about it, similar to a prior study of >1000 oncology doctors and nurses, where 54% recognised a colleague making a harmful error and 37% remained silent at least once 16. However, the prevalence of professionalism breaches was higher, with three-quarters of interns and residents reporting that they had observed such behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…First, about half of residents reported observing a safety threat during their most recent inpatient month, and about 70% spoke up about it, similar to a prior study of >1000 oncology doctors and nurses, where 54% recognised a colleague making a harmful error and 37% remained silent at least once 16. However, the prevalence of professionalism breaches was higher, with three-quarters of interns and residents reporting that they had observed such behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In reporting the results, we present the quantitative distribution of the incidents as background to the qualitative findings, but note that it is not appropriate to use counts of voluntary incident reports as a measure of incident numbers that have occurred (Schwappach & Gehring, 2015;Westbrook et al, 2015). While we report on all types of medication incidents reported, we focus on TA B L E 1 Coding scheme for classification of medication-related incidents…”
Section: Classification Of Emm-related Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As situações que predispõem a redução da qualidade e aumento do risco de eventos adversos incluem o avanço tecnológico com insuficiente educação em serviço, falha na aplicação do processo de enfermagem, desmotivação, delegação da assistência sem supervisão apropriada e sobrecarga de trabalho (3) .…”
unclassified
“…apontam que a maioria dos acidentes nos setores de radioterapia está relacionado à documentação incompleta e/ou errada. Para evitá-los, as informações detalhadas necessitam estar descritas no plano de tratamento do paciente, as quais devem ser claramente comunicadas e documentadas por toda equipe (radioterapeutas, físicos, enfermeiros e oncologistas), além do desenvolvimento de software para aumentar a eficiência e eficácia do planejamento do tratamento de radioterápico (3) .…”
unclassified