2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of clonal mast cell diseases among patients presenting with anaphylaxis: A prospective study in 178 patients from 5 tertiary centers in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term 'syndrome' and thus MCAS should be reserved for patients who demonstrably suffer from significant MCA-related events meeting MCAS criteria. There are also conditions that predispose individuals to MCA events and thus to MCAS, including hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HAT) and/or systemic mastocytosis (SM), which also can result in more severe IgE-dependent reactions, particularly to insect venoms (Supplemental Table S2) [21][22][23][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. In SM, these patients may be labeled with the appendix SY (symptomatic) when they require continuous interventional treatment with MC stabilizers or mediator-targeting drugs, even if no MCAS is diagnosed [21].…”
Section: Diagnostic Consensus Criteria Of Mcasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term 'syndrome' and thus MCAS should be reserved for patients who demonstrably suffer from significant MCA-related events meeting MCAS criteria. There are also conditions that predispose individuals to MCA events and thus to MCAS, including hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HAT) and/or systemic mastocytosis (SM), which also can result in more severe IgE-dependent reactions, particularly to insect venoms (Supplemental Table S2) [21][22][23][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. In SM, these patients may be labeled with the appendix SY (symptomatic) when they require continuous interventional treatment with MC stabilizers or mediator-targeting drugs, even if no MCAS is diagnosed [21].…”
Section: Diagnostic Consensus Criteria Of Mcasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, most adults presenting with MIS have SM, and thereby, they should undergo BM examination 2 . By contrast, only a small fraction (<10%) of adults presenting with an MC activation syndrome (MCAS) without skin lesions show BM involvement by clonal MC and SM—for example, typically BM mastocytosis (BMM) 9 . For those latter cases, diagnostic algorithms such as the REMA (Spanish Network on Mastocytosis) 10 and NICAS (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) 11 scores have been proposed to identify patients at higher risk of SM who should undergo BM analysis. In line with recent recommendations by the ECNM‐AIM (EU‐USA) 12,13 consortium, in the NICAS score, demonstration of a somatic mutation in codon 816 of the stem cell growth factor receptor gene ( KIT D816V) in whole blood genomic DNA (gDNA) has been proposed as a strong predictor for BM involvement and SM 14–16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%