1991
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)91004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients with coronary artery bypass grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a suggestion that the leg with the great saphenous vein harvested could have a higher risk of DVT compared to the contralateral leg (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.96–2.26; P =0.07; I 2 =71%), but this result did not reach statistical significance and had substantial heterogeneity (Figure 7). Restricting the analysis to studies that used routine USS for both legs20, 25, 31, 36 did not change the results significantly (RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.96–2.61; P =0.07; I 2 =77%). Metaregression suggested that sample size was likely the main reason behind this heterogeneity (slope=0.004; 95% CI, 0.002–0.006; P =0.001; Figure 8), with large sample size studies more likely to show an increased risk of DVT in the leg with the great saphenous vein harvested than smaller studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was a suggestion that the leg with the great saphenous vein harvested could have a higher risk of DVT compared to the contralateral leg (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.96–2.26; P =0.07; I 2 =71%), but this result did not reach statistical significance and had substantial heterogeneity (Figure 7). Restricting the analysis to studies that used routine USS for both legs20, 25, 31, 36 did not change the results significantly (RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.96–2.61; P =0.07; I 2 =77%). Metaregression suggested that sample size was likely the main reason behind this heterogeneity (slope=0.004; 95% CI, 0.002–0.006; P =0.001; Figure 8), with large sample size studies more likely to show an increased risk of DVT in the leg with the great saphenous vein harvested than smaller studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The majority of the studies were observational studies (n=49), 16 studies were RCTs, and 3 were meta‐analyses (Tables 1 and 2). 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84 Of the 16 RCTs identified,1...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are studies showing that sonographic examination can definitely be used as a screening test in asymptomatic patients. [8][9][10][11] These include studies of asymptomatic patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 8 acute medical patients, 9 patients undergoing sonography as an initial examination for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism, 10 and healthy people after long-haul flights. 11 Finally, distal calf veins were not examined in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated, based on extrapolated data, that 1,100 -1,300 deaths occur in the United States each year as a result of VTE after coronary artery bypass grafting. 27 Although asymptomatic VTE occurs frequently, 28 symptomatic VTE can also go undetected after cardiac surgery, because symptoms-such as shortness of breath and leg discomfort or swelling-may be attributed to the expected consequences of the preexisting conditions or surgery (i.e., saphenous vein harvest). 27 The overall risk of clinically important VTE may be relatively low after coronary artery bypass grafting, but patients often require anticoagulation because of unstable angina or the presence of other risk factors.…”
Section: Vte After Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%