2011
DOI: 10.1186/ar3495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of disease-associated and other nuclear autoantibodies in patients of the German network for systemic scleroderma: correlation with characteristic clinical features

Abstract: IntroductionIn the present study, we analysed in detail nuclear autoantibodies and their associations in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients included in the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma Registry.MethodsSera of 863 patients were analysed according to a standardised protocol including immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, line immunoassay and immunodiffusion.ResultsAntinuclear antibodies (ANA) were detected in 94.2% of patients. In 81.6%, at least one of the autoantibodies highly associated with SSc … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
149
5
19

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
30
149
5
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, ANA detection has been confirmed as the first level test for the serology of SARD by an international expert panel [1]. As a matter of fact, classical ANA testing requires the characterization of positive ANA findings by immunoassays for the detection of specific autoAbs to nuclear and cytoplasmic autoantigenic targets in the framework of the recommended two-tier approach [30][31][32]. However, this diagnostic two-step process has proved to be laborious and created constraints in particular for larger laboratories with high throughput [16,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, ANA detection has been confirmed as the first level test for the serology of SARD by an international expert panel [1]. As a matter of fact, classical ANA testing requires the characterization of positive ANA findings by immunoassays for the detection of specific autoAbs to nuclear and cytoplasmic autoantigenic targets in the framework of the recommended two-tier approach [30][31][32]. However, this diagnostic two-step process has proved to be laborious and created constraints in particular for larger laboratories with high throughput [16,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have extrapolated this number from the total number of patients analyzed for antinuclear antibodies. Therefore, prevalence of anti-RNAP III may have been underestimated in these studies (30)(31)(32)(33)36,38,43). To address this issue, Supplementary Table 1 (available on the Arthritis & Rheumatology web site at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1002/art.38219/abstract) shows the results of the quality evaluation.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Anti-rnap III In Ssc 413mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, these cases illustrate the extended period of time often needed to diagnose these patients and the key role of anti-PM/Scl antibodies in confirming the diagnosis. This antibody correlates strongly with the syndrome 8,9 and results in a nucleolar antinuclear antibody pattern 8,10 . Although it can be observed in isolated DM/JDM or SSc, 80% of patients with anti-PM/Scl antibodies will have overlap SSc/myositis syndrome 4 .…”
Section: Four Cases Of Anti-pm/scl Antibody-positive Juvenile Overlapmentioning
confidence: 99%