2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of High-Risk Patients Not Receiving High-Potency Statin (from a Large Managed Care Database)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion criteria were based not only on cholesterol levels (>70 mg/dL despite treatment with statins) but on a high cardiovascular risk associated with the presence of a documented coronary disease or a coronary artery disease equivalent (defined as peripheral arterial disease, prior ischaemic stroke, moderate chronic kidney disease with GFR 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 body surface area), or diabetes mellitus plus two or more additional risk factors (hypertension; ankle–brachial index ≤0.90; microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria, or urine dipstick >2+ proteins; retinopathy; or a family history of premature coronary disease) 84 . In the USA, 47.5% of high-risk adult dyslipidaemics are currently not on statins and just 25% of high-risk patients receive high-intensity statins 233 . This rate is even lower in Europe, where a high-intensity statin is prescribed in less than 10% of all high-risk patients 234 .…”
Section: Eligibility For Treatment With Pcsk9 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria were based not only on cholesterol levels (>70 mg/dL despite treatment with statins) but on a high cardiovascular risk associated with the presence of a documented coronary disease or a coronary artery disease equivalent (defined as peripheral arterial disease, prior ischaemic stroke, moderate chronic kidney disease with GFR 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 body surface area), or diabetes mellitus plus two or more additional risk factors (hypertension; ankle–brachial index ≤0.90; microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria, or urine dipstick >2+ proteins; retinopathy; or a family history of premature coronary disease) 84 . In the USA, 47.5% of high-risk adult dyslipidaemics are currently not on statins and just 25% of high-risk patients receive high-intensity statins 233 . This rate is even lower in Europe, where a high-intensity statin is prescribed in less than 10% of all high-risk patients 234 .…”
Section: Eligibility For Treatment With Pcsk9 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with PGT (test group) and without (control group) were identified in a stepwise fashion (Figure ). Individuals with MAPD, Medicaid, or commercial coverage and ≥1 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)‐related diagnosis were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) diagnosis codes (Table ) in any position on any medical claim during the study period …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes (Table S1) in any position on any medical claim during the study period. 23 Individuals with ≥1 paid medical claim for CV-related PGT (Table 1) were included in the test group. CV-related pharmacogenomic tests were selected based upon literature published in nationally peer-reviewed journals, utilisation, and having a defined Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code.…”
Section: International Classification Of Diseases Ninth Revision CLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the use of statins, previous research has shown that a substantial proportion of treated high-risk patients fail to achieve target LDL-C levels. (10, 11) Moreover, statin intolerance is a common concern in clinical practice, with wide variation of individual lipid-lowering and risk reduction. (1215) A substantial proportion of patients not meeting conventional LDL-C goals—more than 73 million U.S. adults (32%) experience elevated LDL-C(16)—suggests substantial benefits in reducing the burden of hypercholesterolemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%