2023
DOI: 10.5194/cp-19-23-2023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of large volcanic eruptions over the past 200 000 years

Abstract: Abstract. Volcanic eruptions are the dominant cause of natural variability in climate forcing on timescales up to multidecadal. Large volcanic eruptions lead to global-scale climate effects and influence the carbon cycle on long timescales. However, estimating the frequency of eruptions is challenging. Here we assess the frequency at which eruptions with particular deposition fluxes are observed in the EPICA Dome C ice core over the last 200 kyr. Using S isotope analysis we confirm that most of the largest pea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work confirms the stratospheric and likely tropical origin of this eruption deposit, which is the second largest of the last 100 ka in the EDC core, by the presence of one of the largest mass independent fractionation sulfur isotope signatures on record from a volcanic aerosol ice core deposit (Δ 33 S = +2.99 ± 0.14 ‰ (2 SD) 26 ). In this case, the large positive Δ 33 S rules out a contribution of proximal, tropospheric sulfate which would result in a muted or 0 ‰ Δ 33 S value in the ice core 27,28 .…”
Section: Ice Core Evidencesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work confirms the stratospheric and likely tropical origin of this eruption deposit, which is the second largest of the last 100 ka in the EDC core, by the presence of one of the largest mass independent fractionation sulfur isotope signatures on record from a volcanic aerosol ice core deposit (Δ 33 S = +2.99 ± 0.14 ‰ (2 SD) 26 ). In this case, the large positive Δ 33 S rules out a contribution of proximal, tropospheric sulfate which would result in a muted or 0 ‰ Δ 33 S value in the ice core 27,28 .…”
Section: Ice Core Evidencesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Having identified the LCY sulfate peak in both Greenland and Antarctica, we use new and existing continuous sulfate (and sulfur) concentration data across the volcanic peak to estimate the total sulfate deposition in each ice core following established methods (see methods) 26,41,42 . In addition to NEEM, NGRIP and EDC, further high-resolution sulfate data from corresponding LCY candidate peaks identified in Greenland ice core GISP2 and Antarctic ice core EDML are used to improve our estimation of sulfur deposition at both poles.…”
Section: Sulfur Loading and Climate Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volcanic sulfate peaks are many times greater in magnitude than the sulfate background, which is dominated by marine sources. Furthermore, these easily identifiable signals occur regularly through time (Wolff et al, 2023), meaning evolution of their form resulting from diffusion and ice thinning can be traced down-core. In this study, we use EDC sulfate data measured using fast ion chromatography (FIC) (Severi et al, 2015;Fudge et al, 2023).…”
Section: Volcanic Sulfate Peaks In Edc Ice Corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term background signal was removed from the sulfate data by subtracting a 200 yr moving median. Following Wolff et al (2023), we multiply the residual sulfate concentrations between 0 and 358.6 m by (1/0.7) to account for a calibration discrepancy identified between FIC and standard ion chromatography measurements on EDC ice. Note that although this adjustment will impact our quantification of peak height and peak area in this depth interval, there is no impact on the estimation of diffusion rate.…”
Section: Identification Of Volcanic Sulfate Peaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation