SummaryCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to be effective for heart failure. However, as outlined in the AHA/ACC/HRS Appropriate Use Criteria, CRT is not strongly recommended for patients with a narrow QRS complex. We describe a case of dilated cardiomyopathy and narrow QRS complex in which we obtained a dramatic response to CRT by optimizing the atrioventricular (AV) delay. The patient was a 61-year-old man with intractable heart failure. Echocardiography showed a low ejection fraction of 22% but no dyssynchrony. Because he had been hospitalized many times for congestive heart failure despite β-blocker and diuretic treatment, we decided to use CRT. However, after implantation of the CRT device, the QRS complex widened abnormally, and his symptoms worsened. He was re-admitted 2 months after CRT implantation. We examined the pacemaker status and optimized the AV delay to obtain a "narrow" QRS complex. The patient's condition improved dramatically after the AV delay optimization. His clinical status has been good, and there has been no subsequent hospitalization. Our case points to the effectiveness of CRT in patients with a narrow QRS complex and to the importance of AV optimization for successful CRT. (Int Heart J 2015; 56: 671-675) Key words: CRT responder, Narrow QRS complex, Dilated cardiomyopathy T he effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is well understood in cases of heart failure with a wide QRS complex ≥ 150 ms. Whether CRT is effective in patients with a narrow QRS complex is controversial, and its application in such patients is not usually recommended. However, in clinical practice, we often see patients with severe heart failure and a narrow QRS, and these patients are generally not considered candidates for CRT. Thus, it is difficult to manage these patients. Here, we present a case of dilated cardiomyopathy with a narrow QRS complex that was treated successfully by CRT with AV optimization. The good outcome achieved in this case points to the possibility of expanding CRT beyond current guidelines.
Case ReportA 61-year-old man with dilated cardiomyopathy was referred to our hospital because of drug-refractory heart failure. Echocardiography showed an enlarged left ventricle with a low ejection fraction of 22%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III heart failure was noted. His plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration was 1793 pg/mL. Sinus rhythm with a narrow QRS complex of 112 ms was seen on the electrocardiogram (ECG) (Figure 1). Despite β-blocker (carvedilol), diuretic (furosemide), and methyldigoxin (lanirapid) therapy, the patient had been hospitalized repeatedly for acute-congestive heart failure. The β-blocker dosage was 1.25 mg/day, which we thought might be inadequate. We attempted to increase the dosage, but the patient did not tolerate the increase well; hypotension and dizziness ensued. Therefore, although the QRS complex was narrow, we decided to apply cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) before trying again to increase ...