Frequency of Lost to Follow-Up and Associated Factors for Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of lost to follow-up (LTFU) in the setting of usual care for outpatients with rheumatic diseases including RA, SLE, AS, and Ps/PsA, to explore the associated demographic factors, and to investigate the reasons for being LTFU from the original medical care.MethodsPatients registered between May 2011 and January 2014 at the rheumatology outpatient department of a medical center were included. Those who did not attend their scheduled appointment were defined as LTFU. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors for being LTFU.ResultsA total of 781 patients were enrolled, including 406 patients with RA, 174 with SLE, 136 with AS, and 65 with Ps/PsA. The frequency of LTFU was 23.9%, 25.9%, 35.3%, and 35.4%, respectively. The frequency of LTFU was significantly different between the four rheumatic diseases (p = 0.028). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, an older age increased being LTFU in the patients with RA (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.04; p = 0.033), but reduced being LTFU in those with Ps/PsA (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92–0.99; p = 0.021). Female patients with SLE and Ps/PsA were more likely to be LTFU, although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.056 and 0.071, respectively). The most common reason for being LTFU was moving to other district hospitals from the original medical center due to convenience for the patients with RA and SLE, and stopping medication due to minimal symptoms for the patients with AS and Ps/PsA.ConclusionsThe frequency of LTFU in patients with rheumatic diseases is high. Associated demographic factors included older age in RA, female gender in SLE and Ps/PsA, and younger age in Ps/PsA, with various reasons for being LTFU. Recognizing these associated factors and reasons for being LTFU may help to improve the attendance of patients and the quality of medical care.

Effect of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on the Risk of Incident Respiratory Failure: A National Cohort Study

“…Both cohorts had similar sex and age distributions (chi-squared test: P = .99) and higher proportions of women (88.0%) and patients older than 35 years (53.2%). The mean age of the patients was 35.9 years in both cohorts (Student t test: P = .93)[ 36 ]. The SLE cohort also included patients with childhood onset of SLE, and the number of SLE patients younger than 10 years was 139.…”

My joint pain, a web-based resource, effects on education and quality of care at 24 months

“…The reason for the worsening emotional wellbeing could be attributed to the natural history of the disease that continuously progresses over time. Evidence also suggests people with fewer symptoms are more likely to drop out in both clinical and research settings [31], and those who needed more support or had more severe symptom tend to complete follow-ups.…”

Treatment patterns and achievement of the treat-to-target goals in a real-life rheumatoid arthritis patient cohort: data from 1317 patients

“…In our case, follow-up evaluation was not available in 38% of patients. Although undesirable, these loss to follow-up rates are not infrequent in real-life observational studies of patients not only with rheumatic diseases (24–35%), 46 but also in other settings, such as post-operatively after spine surgery (59%). 47 Moreover, 15% of patients were excluded from final analysis due to missing disease activity data, a percentage similar to or even lower from other RA registries.…”