2016
DOI: 10.4103/1658-5984.180618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of middle mesial canals in mandibular first molars in North Indian population - An in vivo study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 1 2 14 ] With the introduction of the DOM and 3D imaging, the fin and confluent configurations were also identified. [ 33 34 35 ] Hence, in contemporary studies, a greater prevalence of the confluent configuration compared to fin and independent configurations has been reported. [ 9 33 34 35 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ 1 2 14 ] With the introduction of the DOM and 3D imaging, the fin and confluent configurations were also identified. [ 33 34 35 ] Hence, in contemporary studies, a greater prevalence of the confluent configuration compared to fin and independent configurations has been reported. [ 9 33 34 35 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 33 34 35 ] Hence, in contemporary studies, a greater prevalence of the confluent configuration compared to fin and independent configurations has been reported. [ 9 33 34 35 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Karapinar-Kazandag et al reported a higher number of additional mesial canals located closer to the mesiolingual canal in their study [17]. In a study evaluating the frequency of middle mesial canals in a North Indian population, the authors found that among 258 mandibular first molars, in 67% of the cases the mid-mesial canal orifice was located in the middle of the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canal orifices, 20% had the orifice closer to the mesiolingual canal, while the remaining 12% had the orifices located closer to the mesiobuccal canal [19]. Differences in observation by various authors may be attributed to difference in study methodology, population studied, and number of teeth included in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Higher prevalence of MMC in mandibular first molars with two distal canals (45.4%) than the ones with one distal canal (13.7%). MMC was located in the middle of MB/ML orifices in 67% of cases from an Indian population and 20% had the orifice closer to the ML canal and 12% had the orifices located closer to the MB canal [11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%