PLOS ONE | https://doi.active labour (AOR 2.72 95% CI: 1. 49-4.96). Married participants (AOR 0.59 95% CI: 0.35-0.97) with a delivery plan (AOR 0.56 95% CI: 0.35-0.90) and educated partners (AOR 0.57 95% CI: 0.33-0.98) were less likely to have OL. In the adjusted analysis, there was no association between four or more ANC visits and OL, adjusted odds ratio [(AOR) 0.96 95% CI: 0.57-1.63)].
ConclusionsPrime parity, use of herbal medicines in labour and being a referral from a lower health facility were identified as risk factors. Being married with a delivery plan and an educated partner were protective of OL. Increased frequency of ANC attendance was not protective against obstructed labour.Risk factors for obstructed labour PLOS ONE | https://doi.Cases were women with OL carrying singleton, term pregnancies in cephalic presentation. Controls were women in active labour without obstruction carrying singleton, term pregnancies in cephalic presentation.
Exclusion criteriaWe excluded women with other obstetric emergencies such as antepartum haemorrhage, Preeclampsia and eclampsia (defined as elevated blood pressure of at least 140/90 mmHg, urine protein of at least 2+, any of the danger signs and fits), premature rupture of membranes and Risk factors for obstructed labour PLOS ONE | https://doi.