1991
DOI: 10.1037/h0079260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of visitation by divorced fathers: Differences in reports by fathers and mothers.

Abstract: Most previous research documenting the frequent abandonment by fathers of contact with their children has been based on survey responses of custodial mothers. The present survey of 220 divorcing couples revealed that the noncustodial parents reported significantly more visits with their children, as well as significantly more denial of visitation by their ex-spouses, than did the custodial parents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
7

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
39
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Mothers reported on their child’s contact with the father using two items that assessed telephone contact and in-person contact from the Dad Contact/Maternal Barriers to Father Contact measure (Braver, Wolchik, Sandler, Fogas, & Zvetina, 1991), “Think about the different types of contact your ex-husband has had with your child during the past month. How often have they talked on the telephone?” and “How many different times did your ex-husband visit with your child during the last month?” representing counts of number of instances of contact.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mothers reported on their child’s contact with the father using two items that assessed telephone contact and in-person contact from the Dad Contact/Maternal Barriers to Father Contact measure (Braver, Wolchik, Sandler, Fogas, & Zvetina, 1991), “Think about the different types of contact your ex-husband has had with your child during the past month. How often have they talked on the telephone?” and “How many different times did your ex-husband visit with your child during the last month?” representing counts of number of instances of contact.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two items from the Adolescent/Non-Residential Parent Contact Scale (Braver et al, 1991) were used: “How often has your (dad/mom’s ex-husband) visited with you during the past year?” and “How often has your (dad/mom’s ex-husband) had phone or mail contact with you during the past year?” For both items, responses were rated (1) not at all, (2) once a year, (3) several times a year, (4) 1-3 times a month, (5) once a week, and (6) several times a week. We selected adolescent reports of contact as the most valid indicators of father-adolescent time together, and these were moderately correlated with mother reports of in-person contact, r (154) = .52, p < .001, and phone/email contact, r (154) = .40, p < .001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der Test verfügt über eine hohe interne Konsistenz (Cronbach's Alpha = .80) und Retest-Reliabilität (r = .77). (Ashrons, 1983;Braver, Wolchik, Sandler, Fogas, 1991). Letztlich kann es angesichts der Tatsache, dass es sich dabei um Wahrnehmungen und Einschätzungen handelt, nicht darum gehen, einen objektiv validen Wert zu ermitteln, sondern die Diskrepanzen aufzuzeigen und eine Möglichkeit zu schaffen, diese zum Beispiel in der Beratungssituation zu bearbeiten, wofür wir das Instrument als geeignet erachten.…”
Section: Perspektiven Der Eltern Und Kinderunclassified