1984
DOI: 10.1109/proc.1984.12844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency optimization of focused microwave hyperthermia applicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the focality of our proposed methodology is lower than the millimeter level specificity of DBS devices. Our future work will use systematic algorithmic optimization of the two arrays' locations [52] and the choice of frequency [53][54][55] to potentially achieve high EMvelop stimulation intensity and focality values. Other ways to improve focality include increasing the size of the array [21] or harnessing unconventional antenna patterns created by the non-adjacent placement of the antenna elements in an array [56].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the focality of our proposed methodology is lower than the millimeter level specificity of DBS devices. Our future work will use systematic algorithmic optimization of the two arrays' locations [52] and the choice of frequency [53][54][55] to potentially achieve high EMvelop stimulation intensity and focality values. Other ways to improve focality include increasing the size of the array [21] or harnessing unconventional antenna patterns created by the non-adjacent placement of the antenna elements in an array [56].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a)) with a specific type, such as horn [17], dipole antenna [19][20][21], or electric current filaments [22,23], which prevents the results from being the global optimum. Since any physical antenna has an inherent dependency on frequency, the optimal frequency obtained over a confined source domain cannot be claimed as the global optimum, either [19][20][21]24]. As a result, currently, various types of sources are employed in practice with their operating frequency lying from a low megahertz to a gigahertz range [16,25] in the lack of convincing arguments that which one should yield the global optimum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%