2017
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency patterns of semantic change: corpus-based evidence of a near-critical dynamics in language change

Abstract: It is generally believed that when a linguistic item acquires a new meaning, its overall frequency of use rises with time with an S-shaped growth curve. Yet, this claim has only been supported by a limited number of case studies. In this paper, we provide the first corpus-based large-scale confirmation of the S-curve in language change. Moreover, we uncover another generic pattern, a latency phase preceding the S-growth, during which the frequency remains close to constant. We propose a usage-based model which… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in recent years, a growing group of historical (socio-)linguists has placed more explicit emphasis on using corpus data to study individual language use (e. g., papers in this issue; Schmid and Mantlik 2015;Feltgen et al 2017;Hundt et al 2017;Petré 2017;Petré and Van de Velde 2018). In two notable studies, Nevalainen et al (2011) and Baxter and Croft (2016) set out to investigate how individuals behave with respect to morphological and syntactic variation that is diachronically unstable at the population level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in recent years, a growing group of historical (socio-)linguists has placed more explicit emphasis on using corpus data to study individual language use (e. g., papers in this issue; Schmid and Mantlik 2015;Feltgen et al 2017;Hundt et al 2017;Petré 2017;Petré and Van de Velde 2018). In two notable studies, Nevalainen et al (2011) and Baxter and Croft (2016) set out to investigate how individuals behave with respect to morphological and syntactic variation that is diachronically unstable at the population level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of greatest utility from the perspective of understanding language change are large diachronic collections of language use, as from these one can extract trajectories of change and dynamics of competition between communicative variants. One body of research aims to quantify statistical laws of language change over time, those of word growth and decline, and relationships between word frequencies and lexical evolution (Cuskley et al, 2014;Feltgen et al, 2017;Keller and Schultz, 2013;Keller and Schultz, 2014;Lieberman et al, 2007;Newberry et al, 2017;Pagel et al, 2007). This has also involved claims of the effects of real-world events (like wars) on these processes (Bochkarev et al, 2014;Petersen et al, 2012;Wijaya and Yeniterzi, 2011).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of frequency has been recognized in linguistics, such as in studying the relation of frequency and language typology (Bentz, Alikaniotis, Samardžić, & Buttery, 2017), the importance of lexical frequency for designing teaching materials (Criado & Sánchez, 2012), and the relation between frequency and language change (Feltgen, Fagard, & Nadal, 2017). In text analysis, frequency holds a salient role because each text might have its own lexical choice that results in different frequency of use (Biber, 2012).…”
Section: A R T I C L E I N F O Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%