2017
DOI: 10.1002/path.4915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequent IDH2 R172 mutations in undifferentiated and poorly-differentiated sinonasal carcinomas

Abstract: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a high-grade malignancy with limited treatment options and poor outcome. A morphologic spectrum of 47 sinonasal tumors including 17 (36.2%) SNUCs were analyzed at genomic level. Thirty carcinomas (Cohort 1) were subjected to a hybridization exon-capture next-generation sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT™) to interrogate somatic variants in 279 or 410 cancer-related genes. Seventeen sinonasal tumors (Cohort 2) were examined only for presence of IDH1/2 exon 4 mutations by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In low‐grade SNAC, recurrent translocations involving EV6 have been described 12 as well as recurrent mutations in CTNNB1 and BRAF 13,14 . High‐grade SNAC have been shown to carry IDH2 mutations in approximately 25% of cases, in addition to recurrent mutations in CREBBP, APC, and NOTCH1 15,16 . In the present case describing a high‐grade SNAC, whole exome sequencing did not reveal somatic mutations in these genes.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 47%
“…In low‐grade SNAC, recurrent translocations involving EV6 have been described 12 as well as recurrent mutations in CTNNB1 and BRAF 13,14 . High‐grade SNAC have been shown to carry IDH2 mutations in approximately 25% of cases, in addition to recurrent mutations in CREBBP, APC, and NOTCH1 15,16 . In the present case describing a high‐grade SNAC, whole exome sequencing did not reveal somatic mutations in these genes.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 47%
“…Data on the molecular features of olfactory neuroblastoma and sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC) are limited. In small cell SNEC, the pattern of copy-number alterations is complex and genetics seem to show overlap with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung with mutations of TP53 and RB1, upregulation of BCL2 signaling, and activation of MYC and PI3K pathways (86,92). A similar overlap in copy number alterations between neuroendocrine carcinoma of the salivary gland a lung has also been reported (93).…”
Section: Smarcb1-deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma Often Show Either Hetementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Approximately, half of SNUC harbor activating IDH2 R172 mutations which are also known from other malignancies, especially glioma, but is restricted to SNUC in the head and neck (Fig. B; ). Inhibitors of mutant IDH2 have been shown to induce differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia, which opens up for a new venue for targeted treatment in SNUC .…”
Section: Tumors Of the Sinonasal Tractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Tumors arising from the nasopharynx are different from those arising from the paranasal sinuses. 7,8 Third, the genomic profile of NPSCC in the 62 cases reported in the study by Ali et al 1 appears to be largely similar to that of head and neck SCC. In fact, from the tumor sites shown by the authors in Table 1, 1 it is highly possible that tumors from other head and neck regions, instead of the nasopharynx, were included in their genome profiling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, the unconventional "combined site" defined by Ali et al as "nasopharynx and paranasal sinuses" 1 may suggest a possible inclusion of sinonasal carcinoma for sequencing, which is known to harbor a high rate of IDH2 mutations. 7,8 Third, the genomic profile of NPSCC in the 62 cases reported in the study by Ali et al 1 appears to be largely similar to that of head and neck SCC. 9 The tumor sites listed in Table 1 under the NPSCC subtype indeed included various head and neck regions (ear, head and neck, larynx, mouth, lymph nodes, nasal cavity, etc).…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%