2021
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This review touted an aggregate graft survival rate of 86.6% with significant improvements in PROMs reported (AOFAS ankle/hindfoot score in 6 studies; VAS score in 5 studies) over an 18-year period (2000-2018). 29 This review provides the most comprehensive summary of complications and reoperation following allograft transplantation. A total of 21.6% of patients required minor subsequent procedures, most commonly arthroscopic debridement and removal of hardware.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review touted an aggregate graft survival rate of 86.6% with significant improvements in PROMs reported (AOFAS ankle/hindfoot score in 6 studies; VAS score in 5 studies) over an 18-year period (2000-2018). 29 This review provides the most comprehensive summary of complications and reoperation following allograft transplantation. A total of 21.6% of patients required minor subsequent procedures, most commonly arthroscopic debridement and removal of hardware.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For allografts, the pooled clinical success rate was found to be 55% in secondary lesions and ranged from 20 to 100% for primary lesions in a systematic review ( 45 ). In another recent systematic review, the mean preoperative AOFAS score of six studies was 50 and increased to 80 at follow-up ( 46 ). The VAS pain score improved from 7.3 preoperatively to 2.6 at follow-up in five studies.…”
Section: Therapy Of Osteochondral Lesion Of the Talusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified version of the original CMS [ 31 ] was created to specifically assess the quality of studies on cartilage repair. The score uses 10 specific criteria to formally assess study quality and has been used in a number of similar studies [ 11 , 30 , 32 , 33 ]. Each study is given a score for each section, with a final score ranging between 0 (worst quality) and 100 (highest quality).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%