2023
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.14064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fretting fatigue tests and microstructure analysis of bridge stay cable wires

Abstract: Saddle systems are a popular method for supporting the cables at the pylons of cable‐stayed bridges. Fretting fatigue failure of bridge stay cables is a major design consideration for saddle systems. Current design provisions require large‐scale tests of these anchoring systems. However, such tests are costly and time‐consuming. With this in mind, the current paper presents a small‐scale fretting fatigue setup to evaluate the fretting fatigue behavior of bridge stay cable wires at saddle supports. In this pape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent tests at TU Berlin and the University of Waterloo show that the COF of cables in contact with the saddle can range from 0.6 to 0.8 (Chehrazi 2022; Mohareb 2020). Therefore, it was decided to perform the wear modelling process and fretting fatigue life evaluation using a COF of 0.7, which falls between the reported COFs in these works.…”
Section: Modelling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent tests at TU Berlin and the University of Waterloo show that the COF of cables in contact with the saddle can range from 0.6 to 0.8 (Chehrazi 2022; Mohareb 2020). Therefore, it was decided to perform the wear modelling process and fretting fatigue life evaluation using a COF of 0.7, which falls between the reported COFs in these works.…”
Section: Modelling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at this equation, apart from the SWT parameter, cyclic material properties (Coffin-Manson parameters) are required. Coffin-Manson parameters based on the tests performed in (Chehrazi 2022) were used in this analysis: σf = 2183 MPa, b=0.0657, εf=1.99, and c=0.8092.…”
Section: Modelling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of this steel encompasses several key performance indicators, including but not limited to high tensile strength, good toughness, and excellent fatigue resistance. These properties enable the bridge cable steel to withstand immense tensile forces without fracturing, ensuring the safety and reliability of the structure [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. In bridge design, the use of higher-performance bridge cable steel allows for a reduction in the structure’s self-weight, thereby enabling the possibility of longer-span bridge designs [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%