Poster Presentations 2017
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.5564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRI0683 Causes of death in 350 patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD)

Abstract: BackgroundThe major SARD have an increased mortality compared to the general population. It is well known that the main causes of death in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) are infections (INF), cardiovascular events (CV), neoplasia (NEO) and disease activity. However, the compared mortality of Mixed Connective Tissue Disease (MCTD), Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), Poly/Dermatomyositis (PM/DM), overlap syndromes (OS), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), systemic vasculitis (SV), and undifferen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, publications about patients with ITP or autoimmune rheumatologic disease undergoing immunosuppressive therapies report infection as a major cause of morbidity, treatment interruption, and/or discontinuation. 1,2 When appraising the patient's risk of infection, the interactions of various endogenous and exogenous risk factors have to be considered: (1) nonmalignant immune-mediated hematologic diseases are themselves chronic conditions driven by an already dysfunctional immune system; (2) a patient's individual characteristics, such as advanced age (>65 years old), presence of preexisting comorbidities, polypharmacy (ie, ≥5 medications used daily), and risk of drug-drug interaction; the patient's compliance with the immunosuppressive therapy and dose adjustments; compliance and accessibility to clinical and laboratory monitoring; and a patient's rapid response to suspected infections; (3) specific immunosuppressive agents have particular mechanisms of causing immunosuppression, leading to an increased risk for infection with certain pathogens (eg, antimetabolites and risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy [PML]); and (4) higher risk for infection is seen in combination immunosuppressive therapy as opposed to singleagent therapy (Table 1). [2][3][4][5][6] It is a challenge for the clinician to estimate the contribution of each of these risk factors to the overall infection risk because no study has addressed this clinical issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, publications about patients with ITP or autoimmune rheumatologic disease undergoing immunosuppressive therapies report infection as a major cause of morbidity, treatment interruption, and/or discontinuation. 1,2 When appraising the patient's risk of infection, the interactions of various endogenous and exogenous risk factors have to be considered: (1) nonmalignant immune-mediated hematologic diseases are themselves chronic conditions driven by an already dysfunctional immune system; (2) a patient's individual characteristics, such as advanced age (>65 years old), presence of preexisting comorbidities, polypharmacy (ie, ≥5 medications used daily), and risk of drug-drug interaction; the patient's compliance with the immunosuppressive therapy and dose adjustments; compliance and accessibility to clinical and laboratory monitoring; and a patient's rapid response to suspected infections; (3) specific immunosuppressive agents have particular mechanisms of causing immunosuppression, leading to an increased risk for infection with certain pathogens (eg, antimetabolites and risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy [PML]); and (4) higher risk for infection is seen in combination immunosuppressive therapy as opposed to singleagent therapy (Table 1). [2][3][4][5][6] It is a challenge for the clinician to estimate the contribution of each of these risk factors to the overall infection risk because no study has addressed this clinical issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%