2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction of sea ice on sea ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows that µ k varied with respect to normal stress in the cases of CS-Lateral⊥, Lateral⊥-Lateral//, Lateral⊥-Bottom, and Lateral//-Top, and a general trend was detected for µ k to decrease with increasing normal stress. Similar trends were obtained by Oksanen and Keinonen [21], Maeno et al [24], and Pritchard et al [36]; one reason is that as normal load increases, the natural roughness of both contact surfaces or that of the softer surface is smoothed, yielding lower friction coefficients [36,37]. Mizukami and Maeno [42] and Makkonen and Tikanmäki [43] found that the decrease of µ k with normal stress P could be expressed as a power law µ k ∝ P n , with the power n fitted as −0.32 and −0.25 using laboratory tests and a theoretical model respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Normal Stresssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 7 shows that µ k varied with respect to normal stress in the cases of CS-Lateral⊥, Lateral⊥-Lateral//, Lateral⊥-Bottom, and Lateral//-Top, and a general trend was detected for µ k to decrease with increasing normal stress. Similar trends were obtained by Oksanen and Keinonen [21], Maeno et al [24], and Pritchard et al [36]; one reason is that as normal load increases, the natural roughness of both contact surfaces or that of the softer surface is smoothed, yielding lower friction coefficients [36,37]. Mizukami and Maeno [42] and Makkonen and Tikanmäki [43] found that the decrease of µ k with normal stress P could be expressed as a power law µ k ∝ P n , with the power n fitted as −0.32 and −0.25 using laboratory tests and a theoretical model respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Normal Stresssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, the regime of stick-slip motion had a saw-tooth shape, and Fourier analysis indicated that load oscillations in the stick-slip motion had a frequency of 30.10 Hz (Figure 5b). The µ k of stick-slip motion was calculated in the same manner as in the steady-slide case [23,37].…”
Section: Friction Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healing rate versus homologous temperature from this study and other studies on ice and rock. Ice-rock data at PMP from Zoet et al [16]; ice-ice data from Schulson & Fortt [12]; sea ice from Sukhorukov & Loset [49] Quartz from Katayama et al [50]; and granite from Nakatani [51] and Mitchell et al [46]. All other data are from this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the kinetic friction coefficient between sea ice varies from 0.05 (at −20 °C ) to 0.5 (at −2 °C ) [17]. These temperature trends indicate the intrinsic behavior of ice at different temperature regime or it structure phases.…”
Section: Bi-regime Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction coefficient is sensitive to many factors such as pressure, temperature, and the velocity of sliding. Sukhorukov and Loset [17] examined the effects of sliding velocity (6−05 mm/s), air temperatures (−2 to −20 °C ), normal load (300−2,000 N), presence of sea water in the interface, and ice grain orientation with respect to the sliding direction on the friction coefficient of sea ice on itself. The kinetic friction coefficient of sea ice on sea ice varies from 0.05 (at −20 °C ) to 0.5 (at −2 °C ), regardless of the presence of sea water in the sliding interface.…”
Section: Ice On Ice: Pressure Temperature and Velositymentioning
confidence: 99%