1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01274118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction on a granite to granite interface

Abstract: SummaryDirect shear tests were conducted on a granite to granite interface for the purpose of tracing the evolution of frictional resistance as the initially smooth and polished surface wears during continuing shearing displacement. At the moment when sliding on the freshly manufactured interface starts (first slip), the friction angle is very low, between 15 ~ and 20 ~ , but then it increases with displacement rapidly without reaching a peak in the first test (maximum displacement less than 25 ram). Upon repe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion about Wong and Zhao's [1990] data on the velocity dependence of the "static" friction coefficient. Other published studies Teufel and Logan, 1978;Shimamoto and Logan, 1986;Lajtai and Gadi, 1989] have confirmed that the "static" coefficient increased with decreasing load point velocity, in agreement with our numerical simulation results. However, it should be emphasized that as far as the data in Figure 13a and 13b concerned, the stress drop amplitude and its variation with load point velocity were so large that our interpretation should not be biased by the second-order effects from the jacket.…”
Section: Point (B Insupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consequently, it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion about Wong and Zhao's [1990] data on the velocity dependence of the "static" friction coefficient. Other published studies Teufel and Logan, 1978;Shimamoto and Logan, 1986;Lajtai and Gadi, 1989] have confirmed that the "static" coefficient increased with decreasing load point velocity, in agreement with our numerical simulation results. However, it should be emphasized that as far as the data in Figure 13a and 13b concerned, the stress drop amplitude and its variation with load point velocity were so large that our interpretation should not be biased by the second-order effects from the jacket.…”
Section: Point (B Insupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The block was bounded by three steeply dipping fracture surfaces, and rested on a 17 to 27 m wide ledge with downslope dip of 46°. Assuming a static friction angle for unpolished granite of between 42° and 51° (Goodman, ; Lajtai and Gadi, ) and that joint cohesion was minimal dictates that the detached block was, at best, metastable with respect to sliding. However, the fractures bounding the back of the failed rock mass and which formed the detachment surface are inclined at 67° and 90° obliquely to and away from the cliff face, and thus, the center of mass was well‐within the bottom footprint of the block (Figure C), providing resistance to overturning moments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our 2D geometric model considers a plane strain with a thickness far less than the height and width dimensions. The parameters related to granite failure in Equation are derived from Lajtai and Gadi (1989), and the failure equation can be expressed as ψ=()()σ3+C1*normalΔpnormaltnormalQ*()σ1+C1*normalΔpnormalt+normalN*()1+()σ2σ1/()σ3σ1/normalC2, Q=()()1+sinθ/1+sinθ, N=()()2cosθ/()1sinθSo, where, σ 1 , σ 2 , and σ 3 are the principal stresses, Pa. It should be noted that the principal stresses are calculated within the model and updated continuously during the simulation.…”
Section: Failure Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our 2D geometric model considers a plane strain with a thickness far less than the height and width dimensions. The parameters related to granite failure in Equation 24 are derived from Lajtai and Gadi (1989), 55 and the failure equation can be expressed as 53…”
Section: Failure Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%