2020
DOI: 10.7146/mediekultur.v36i67.116141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friends, lovers, risk and intimacy: risk-taking as a socially meaningful practice

Abstract: Th e aim of this study is to understand the notion of risk in photo-sharing practices and the purpose of risk in the development of intimate relationships. We argue that risk in the form of self-disclosure is a key aspect of intimate photo sharing rather than an undesirable side eff ect, and that a broader analytical perspective on the role of risk in the development of intimate relationships allows us to understand risky photo sharing as a socially meaningful practice. We unfold and elaborate the link between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In academic, educational, legal and political contexts, stories of DSA have been circulating in recent years. Digital sexual assault has been described within the realm of gendered violence (Bates, 2017;McGlynn, et al, 2017;Uhl, et al, 2018), as a legal issue in a new mediated society (Henry and Powell, 2016), and often as a part of digital youth cultures (Döring, 2014;Rasmussen and Søndergaard, 2020;Ringrose, et al, 2013;Thorhauge and Bonitz, 2020). While these contributions add immensely to the understanding of digital sexuality and assault, there are certain weaknesses in the field, which I wish to address in this article.…”
Section: Theory: Digital Sexual Assault Shame and Rhythmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In academic, educational, legal and political contexts, stories of DSA have been circulating in recent years. Digital sexual assault has been described within the realm of gendered violence (Bates, 2017;McGlynn, et al, 2017;Uhl, et al, 2018), as a legal issue in a new mediated society (Henry and Powell, 2016), and often as a part of digital youth cultures (Döring, 2014;Rasmussen and Søndergaard, 2020;Ringrose, et al, 2013;Thorhauge and Bonitz, 2020). While these contributions add immensely to the understanding of digital sexuality and assault, there are certain weaknesses in the field, which I wish to address in this article.…”
Section: Theory: Digital Sexual Assault Shame and Rhythmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin with a discussion of sexting, for it is often the key reference point when "intimate" pictures and visual intimacy are discussed (see Th orhauge et al, 2020, for an overview). In usually highly controversial debates, sexting is often described as a fundamentally risky practice (see, e.g., Hasinoff & Shepherd, 2014;Th orhauge & Bonitz, 2020). What makes it so fundamentally ambivalent is that it can imply explicit, visual bodily self-disclosure and provide information about (intimate) bodily features or practices.…”
Section: Visual Self-disclosure: Sexting and "Uglies"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies argue that sexting can be part of regular sexual activity, an extension of an existing sexual relationship, e.g., as a pleasant anticipation, a compensation for the physical absence of a partner in a long-distance relationship, or a prelude to a relationship or hook-up (see, e.g., Harder et al, 2020;Weisskirch & Delevi, 2011). Importantly, studies also stress that sexting can be an activity between friends, a joke, or a practice used during a moment of bonding or exploring sexuality (Albury, 2015;Albury & Crawford, 2012;Th orhauge & Bonitz, 2020). Albury and Crawford's (2012) study shows that some respondents send sexts to maintain intimacy and connections in long-distance relationships.…”
Section: Visual Self-disclosure: Sexting and "Uglies"mentioning
confidence: 99%