2007
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friends or Relatives? Phylogenetics and Species Delimitation in the Controversial European Orchid Genus Ophrys

Abstract: Heterogeneous copies of the nuclear ITS region show that some putative Ophrys species arose through hybridization rather than divergent speciation. The supposedly highly specific pseudocopulatory pollination syndrome of Ophrys is demonstrably 'leaky', suggesting that the genus has been substantially over-divided at the species level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
198
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
198
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The point of view presented here is clearly intermediate between those of the most extreme splitters and lumpers, respectively Delforge (2005) and Devey et al (2008). From a methodological point of view, our taxonomic delimitations are similar to those of Sundermann, which were formally approved by Pedersen and Faurholdt (Pedersen and Faurholdt 2007;Faurholdt and Pedersen 2009), but with a tendency to split more than lump (cf.…”
Section: Taxonomic Debatesupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The point of view presented here is clearly intermediate between those of the most extreme splitters and lumpers, respectively Delforge (2005) and Devey et al (2008). From a methodological point of view, our taxonomic delimitations are similar to those of Sundermann, which were formally approved by Pedersen and Faurholdt (Pedersen and Faurholdt 2007;Faurholdt and Pedersen 2009), but with a tendency to split more than lump (cf.…”
Section: Taxonomic Debatesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For example, the specific pollinators of 80 of the 250 species are unknown (Delforge 2005), chemotaxonomy seems to be promising (Mant et al 2005;Véla et al 2007) but only beginning to be used for delimiting species (cf. Joffard et al 2014), karyology and phylogenetics are still incomplete and were rarely used to identify species (Soliva et al 2001;Devey et al 2008;García-Barriuso 2010) until LFY genes were used (cf. Schlüter et al 2007aSchlüter et al , 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this taxonomic treatment (i.e. the subdivision of the morphs into several species) is extensively argued from both classical taxonomic (Pedersen & Faurhold 2007) and genetic (Devey et al 2008(Devey et al , 2009) aspects, the above taxa shares the common morphological characters of having a convex, saddle-like shaped, dark-purple haired lip with a brightgrey, mirror-like speculum. This common character is thought to have been evolved to attract their genusspecific pollinators (Paulus & Gack 1990): males of the bee genus Chalicodoma Lepeletier, 1841 (Hymenoptera, Aculeata, Megachilidae) (Vereecken & Patiny 2005).…”
Section: Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the complex floral characteristics and economic value of orchids, they have been the subject of many research fields such as experimental (Darwin, 1862;Kullenberg, 1961;Paulus and Gack, 1990), phylogenetic, and reproductive biology (Devey et al, 2008(Devey et al, , 2009Chase et al, 2009), especially of the genus Ophrys. However, there have been a limited number of studies on the micromorphology of flowers of temperate orchids, except for Ophrys and a few other deceptive genera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%