2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2006.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frobenius–Schur indicators and exponents of spherical categories

Abstract: We obtain two formulae for the higher Frobenius-Schur indicators: one for a spherical fusion category in terms of the twist of its center and the other one for a modular tensor category in terms of its twist. The first one is a categorical generalization of an analogous result by Kashina, Sommerhäuser, and Zhu for Hopf algebras, and the second one extends Bantay's 2nd indicator formula for a conformal field theory to higher degree. These formulae imply the sequence of higher indicators of an object in these ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
115
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will see that there are at least 8, and no more than 20, gauge equivalence classes. This makes use of (2) to identify equivalence classes of quasi-bialgebras, together with Frobenius-Schur indicators and their higher analogs [NS3] to distinguish between equivalence classes. Now there is a canonical braiding of these quasiHopf algebras, and using the invariance of the canonical ribbon structure under braided tensor equivalences, which we establish separately, we show that the 20 gauge equivalence classes constitute a complete list of gauge equivalence classes of the quasi-triangular quasi-bialgebras under consideration.…”
Section: ω (G)-mod ∼ = D η (H )-Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will see that there are at least 8, and no more than 20, gauge equivalence classes. This makes use of (2) to identify equivalence classes of quasi-bialgebras, together with Frobenius-Schur indicators and their higher analogs [NS3] to distinguish between equivalence classes. Now there is a canonical braiding of these quasiHopf algebras, and using the invariance of the canonical ribbon structure under braided tensor equivalences, which we establish separately, we show that the 20 gauge equivalence classes constitute a complete list of gauge equivalence classes of the quasi-triangular quasi-bialgebras under consideration.…”
Section: ω (G)-mod ∼ = D η (H )-Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following equation (Eq. 11) is due to Ng and Schauenburg (see the proof of Theorem 5.5 of [18]). We present the proof for the sake of completeness.…”
Section: Proposition 33 There Exists a Root Of Unitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…where θ is the canonical twist of Z(C) and dim(C) = V∈Irr(C) |V| 2 (see [18,Theorem 4.1]). This formula plays an important role in Section 3.…”
Section: Frobenius-schur Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Frobenius-Schur indicators of the simple objects of C can be used to define the Frobenius-Schur exponent of C, denoted FSexp(C). When C is the representation category of a quasi-Hopf algebra, FSexp(C) is equal to exp(C) or 2 exp(C) ([NS2], theorem 6.2) where exp(C) denotes the exponent of C in the sense of Etingof et.al. (see [E] and its references).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%