2021
DOI: 10.1017/fmp.2021.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frobenius splitting of Schubert varieties of semi-infinite flag manifolds

Abstract: We exhibit basic algebro-geometric results on the formal model of semi-infinite flag varieties and its Schubert varieties over an algebraically closed field ${\mathbb K}$ of characteristic $\neq 2$ from scratch. We show that the formal model of a semi-infinite flag variety admits a unique nice (ind-)scheme structure, its projective coordinate ring has a $\mathbb {Z}$ -model and it admits a Frobenius splitting compatible with the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.1 The H-equivariant K-group of semi-infinite flag manifolds. Let Q rat G denote the semi-infinite flag manifold, which is the reduced ind-scheme whose set of C-valued [Kat2] for details), where G is a connected, simply-connected simple algebraic group over C, B = HN is a Borel subgroup, H is a maximal torus, and N is the unipotent radical of B. One has the semi-infinite Schubert (sub)variety…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3.1 The H-equivariant K-group of semi-infinite flag manifolds. Let Q rat G denote the semi-infinite flag manifold, which is the reduced ind-scheme whose set of C-valued [Kat2] for details), where G is a connected, simply-connected simple algebraic group over C, B = HN is a Borel subgroup, H is a maximal torus, and N is the unipotent radical of B. One has the semi-infinite Schubert (sub)variety…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Kat1,Kat3], Kato established an R(H)-module isomorphism Φ from QK H (G/B) onto the H-equivariant K-group K H (Q G ) of the semi-infinite flag manifold Q G , in which tensor product operation with an arbitrary line bundle class is induced from that in K H×C * (Q G ) by the specialization q = 1. In our notation, the R(H)-module isomorphism Φ sends the (opposite) Schubert class e…”
Section: = 0≤l≤kmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let G be a simply-connected simple algebraic group over C with Borel subgroup B = HN , maximal torus H, unipotent radical N , Weyl group W , weight lattice P = i∈I Z̟ i , root lattice Q = i∈I Zα i , and coroot lattice Q ∨ = i∈I Zα ∨ i . The work [KoNOS] initiated the study of inverse Chevalley formulas in the equivariant K-group K H×C * (Q rat G ) of the semi-infinite flag manifold Q rat G associated with G, where the semi-infinite flag manifold Q rat G is a reduced indscheme whose set of C-valued points is G(C((z)))/(H(C)•N (C((z)))) (see [Kat2] for details), with the group C * acting on Q rat G by loop rotation; note that our K-group K H×C * (Q rat G ) is a variant of the Iwahori-equivariant K-group of Q rat G introduced in [KaNS]. The K-group K H×C * (Q rat G ) has a topological K H×C * (pt)-basis consisting of Schubert classes {[O Q G (x) ]} x∈W af indexed by the affine Weyl group W af = W ⋉ Q ∨ , where K H×C * (pt) ∼ = Z[q ±1 ][P ], with K H (pt) = R(H) ∼ = Z[P ] = Z[e λ | λ ∈ P ] the character ring of H and K C * (pt) = R(C * ) ∼ = Z[q ±1 ]; here q ∈ R(C * ) denotes the character of loop rotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%