I propose a two component analytic formula F (s, t) = F (1) (s, t) + F (2) (s, t) for (ab → ab) + (ab → ab) scattering at energies ≥ 100GeV ,where s, t denote squares of c.m. energy and momentum transfer.It saturates the Froissart-Martin bound and obeys Auberson-Kinoshita-Martin (AKM) [1] [2] scaling. I choose ImF (1) (s, 0) + ImF (2) (s, 0) as given by Particle Data Group (PDG) fits [3],[4] to total cross sections, corresponding to simple and triple poles in angular momentum plane. The PDG formula is extended to non-zero momentum transfers using partial waves of ImF (1) and ImF (2) motivated by Pomeron pole and 'grey disk' amplitudes and constrained by inelastic unitarity. ReF (s, t) is deduced from real analyticity: I prove thatand apply it to F (2) .Using also the forward slope fit by Schegelsky-Ryskin [5], the model gives real parts,differential cross sections for (−t) < .3GeV 2 , and inelastic cross sections in good agreement with data at 546GeV, 1.8T eV, 7T eV and 8T eV . It predicts for inelastic cross sections for pp orpp, σ inel = 72.7 ± 1.0 mb at 7T eV and 74.2 ± 1.0 mb at 8T eV in agreement with pp Totem [7][8] [9][10] experimental values 73.1 ± 1.3mb and 74.7 ± 1.7mb respectively, and with Atlas [12][13][14][15] values 71.3 ± 0.9 mb and 71.7 ± 0.7 mb respectively. The predictions σ inel = 48.1 ± 0.7 mb at 546GeV and 58.5 ± 0.8 mb at 1800GeV also agree withpp experimental results of Abe et al [47] 48.4 ± .98mb at 546GeV and 60.3 ± 2.4mb at 1800GeV . The model yields for √ s > 0.5T eV , with PDG2013 [4] total cross sections , and Schegelsky-Ryskin slopes [5] as input, σ inel (s) = 22.6 + .034lns + .158(lns) 2 mb, andσ inel /σtot → 0.56, s → ∞, where s is in GeV 2 units.Continuation to positive t indicates an 'effective' t-channel singularity at ∼ (1.5GeV ) 2 ,and suggests that usual Froissart-Martin bounds are quantitatively weak as they only assume absence of singularities upto 4m 2 π . Introduction. Precision measurements of pp cross sections at LHC [7] [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], and in cosmic rays [17] motivate me to present a model for ab → ab scattering amplitude at c.m. energies √ s >