2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/zpg4x
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From 2D to 3D: enhanced access to human conscious awareness

Abstract: Most of our interactions with our environment involve manipulating real, 3D objects. Accordingly, 3D objects seem to enjoy preferential processing compared with 2D images, for example in capturing attention or being better remembered. But are they also more readily perceived? Thus far, the possible preferred access of real, 3D objects to awareness could not be empirically tested, as suppression was only applied to on-screen stimuli; Here, using a variant of Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) with augmented rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, similar patterns are evident in studies that have used other experimental approaches, such as those that have examined breakthrough to awareness for objects that have been rendered unconscious using continuous flash suppression. Using this approach, real objects break through into awareness sooner than do colored 2-D photographs or computer images of objects, although there is no requirement for the observer to act upon or contact the stimuli (Mudrik & Korisky, 2020;Korisky, Hirschhorn, & Mudrik, 2019). Yet, somatosensory feedback can influence breakthrough: When an observer is asked to manually rotate a platform upon which is presented a highly realistic VR or augmented reality (AR) object, breakthrough to awareness of the virtual stimulus is faster when the visual rotation of the virtual object is coupled with the live sensorimotor act of rotating the platform, compared to when the motor action is paired with prerecorded visual information that is mismatched in movement timing (Suzuki, Schwartzman, Augusto, & Seth, 2019).…”
Section: Why Does a Transparent Barrier Modulate Earlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, similar patterns are evident in studies that have used other experimental approaches, such as those that have examined breakthrough to awareness for objects that have been rendered unconscious using continuous flash suppression. Using this approach, real objects break through into awareness sooner than do colored 2-D photographs or computer images of objects, although there is no requirement for the observer to act upon or contact the stimuli (Mudrik & Korisky, 2020;Korisky, Hirschhorn, & Mudrik, 2019). Yet, somatosensory feedback can influence breakthrough: When an observer is asked to manually rotate a platform upon which is presented a highly realistic VR or augmented reality (AR) object, breakthrough to awareness of the virtual stimulus is faster when the visual rotation of the virtual object is coupled with the live sensorimotor act of rotating the platform, compared to when the motor action is paired with prerecorded visual information that is mismatched in movement timing (Suzuki, Schwartzman, Augusto, & Seth, 2019).…”
Section: Why Does a Transparent Barrier Modulate Earlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the human consciousness has a greater awareness for 3D objects than to their 2D representations [10], therefore it is desirable to provide critical indicators with holographic images of 3D objects and not just plain 2D signs. But if holograms shall provide a realistic 3D image, an adequate light source shall be used, and it also shall be placed at a rather larger distance from the hologram [19] In contrast to real objects holograms are capable to display two or more different 3D images.…”
Section: Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%