2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.10.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From a CFB reactor to a CFB boiler – The review of R&D progress of CFB coal combustion technology in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19][20][21] There are few studies on resource benefits under industrial linkages, and it is impossible to comprehensively analyze the actual effects of energy input and output,and existing research on resource efficiency is mainly concentrated at the national level, while research based on industry or enterprise level is relatively small, so the operability of the policy is low. [22][23][24] Research on resource efficiency brought about by the promotion of CFB is mostly carried out from a certain perspective and a certain partial perspective. Liu et al believe that the use of CFB low calorific value coal power generation technology will fully generate 170 million tons of low calorific value coal for power generation, and will replace 100 million tons of high calorific value raw coal for use in industries and people's livelihood.…”
Section: Domestic and Foreign Research Status On Cfb Resource Efficmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19][20][21] There are few studies on resource benefits under industrial linkages, and it is impossible to comprehensively analyze the actual effects of energy input and output,and existing research on resource efficiency is mainly concentrated at the national level, while research based on industry or enterprise level is relatively small, so the operability of the policy is low. [22][23][24] Research on resource efficiency brought about by the promotion of CFB is mostly carried out from a certain perspective and a certain partial perspective. Liu et al believe that the use of CFB low calorific value coal power generation technology will fully generate 170 million tons of low calorific value coal for power generation, and will replace 100 million tons of high calorific value raw coal for use in industries and people's livelihood.…”
Section: Domestic and Foreign Research Status On Cfb Resource Efficmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using the input‐output method to explore the resource benefits under the concept of recycling, they usually divide the waste production and recycling links, and only consider the input, output, and resource benefits of an industry . There are few studies on resource benefits under industrial linkages, and it is impossible to comprehensively analyze the actual effects of energy input and output,and existing research on resource efficiency is mainly concentrated at the national level, while research based on industry or enterprise level is relatively small, so the operability of the policy is low …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFB boilers have to be equipped with expensive gas clean systems including a flue gas desulphurization (FGD) tower and a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) reactor, which leads to higher investment and operation costs. The additional costs mean traditional CFB boilers no longer have the advantage of lower cost pollution control [52].…”
Section: Background Of Ultra-low Emission Cfb Boiler Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two 220 t/h CFB boilers in Changzhi and Linqing have achieved the goal of ultra-low emission of NO x and SO 2 by improving the cyclone efficiency to increase the bed quality, reducing the average bed material size and increasing the solid circulation rate [52]. The fuel of these two projects is shown in Table 5, the main operation parameters are shown in Table 6, with the cut size of fly ash particle decreasing from 22 μm to 12 μm.…”
Section: Ultra-low Emission Cfb Boiler Technology Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circulating fluidized bed (CFB) technology has demonstrated its ability to efficiently utilize a wide variety of fuels, including high sulfur coal to coal gangue and coal slurries [1]. Taking coal-water slurries containing petrochemicals fuels for example, through experiments and calculations the advantages are much lower anthropogenic emissions and ash residue, low cost of the components, positive economic performance indicators of storage, transportation, and combustion, as well as higher fire and explosion safety [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%