2001
DOI: 10.37236/1580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From a Polynomial Riemann Hypothesis to Alternating Sign Matrices

Abstract: This paper begins with a brief discussion of a class of polynomial Riemann hypotheses, which leads to the consideration of sequences of orthogonal polynomials and 3-term recursions. The discussion further leads to higher order polynomial recursions, including 4-term recursions where orthogonality is lost. Nevertheless, we show that classical results on the nature of zeros of real orthogonal polynomials (i. e., that the zeros of $p_n$ are real and those of $p_{n+1}$ interleave those of $p_n$) may be extended to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [53,Theorem 4], Egecioglu, Redmond and Ryavec prove also the following common generalisation of (5.49) and (5.50). (The first identity is the special case x = 0, while the second is the special case x = 1 of the following theorem.)…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In [53,Theorem 4], Egecioglu, Redmond and Ryavec prove also the following common generalisation of (5.49) and (5.50). (The first identity is the special case x = 0, while the second is the special case x = 1 of the following theorem.)…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Tamm's proof used the fact that Hankel determinants can be evaluated using continued fractions; the continued fraction that gives these Hankel determinants is a special case of Gauss's continued fraction for a quotient of hypergeometric series. The determinant V n was also evaluated, using a different method, by Egecioglu, Redmond, and Ryavec [6,Theorem 4], who also noted the connection with alternating sign matrices and gave several additional Hankel determinants for V n : V n = det (b i+j ) 0≤i,j≤n−1 = det (r i+j ) 0≤i,j≤n−1 = det (s i+j (u)) 0≤i,j≤n−1 , where u is arbitrary. As noted in [6,Theorem 4], s n (0) = b n , s n (1) = a n+1 , and s n (3) = r n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determinant V n was also evaluated, using a different method, by Egecioglu, Redmond, and Ryavec [6,Theorem 4], who also noted the connection with alternating sign matrices and gave several additional Hankel determinants for V n : V n = det (b i+j ) 0≤i,j≤n−1 = det (r i+j ) 0≤i,j≤n−1 = det (s i+j (u)) 0≤i,j≤n−1 , where u is arbitrary. As noted in [6,Theorem 4], s n (0) = b n , s n (1) = a n+1 , and s n (3) = r n . In Section 2, we describe Tamm's continued fraction method for evaluating these determinants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osculating paths are lattice paths that neither cross nor share edges but potentially share points. The idea of describing ASMs in terms of osculating paths dates back to [BH95] and was further investigated in [Bra97], [ERR01], and [Beh08], among others.…”
Section: Astzs As Lattice Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%