2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3229960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Airbnb to Solar: Toward a Transaction Cost Model of a Retail Electricity Distribution Platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have also been regarded as socially cohesive communities connected by a local energy market (Lezama et al , 2019) and discussed in terms of community-based energy trading (Koirala et al , 2016). In terms of added value, customers get access to locally produced renewable energy (Kahrobaee et al , 2014) while the acceptance and adoption of distributed renewable energy can be increased because of the additional value streams created for prosumers (Kiesling et al , 2019). The research literature focuses primarily on market design and implementation, such as bilateral trading (Morstyn et al , 2019), broker-based markets (Chen and Su, 2019), consensus-based approaches (Sorin et al , 2018) and auction mechanisms (Paudel et al , 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have also been regarded as socially cohesive communities connected by a local energy market (Lezama et al , 2019) and discussed in terms of community-based energy trading (Koirala et al , 2016). In terms of added value, customers get access to locally produced renewable energy (Kahrobaee et al , 2014) while the acceptance and adoption of distributed renewable energy can be increased because of the additional value streams created for prosumers (Kiesling et al , 2019). The research literature focuses primarily on market design and implementation, such as bilateral trading (Morstyn et al , 2019), broker-based markets (Chen and Su, 2019), consensus-based approaches (Sorin et al , 2018) and auction mechanisms (Paudel et al , 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amazon) and their growth has caught the attention of academics and the public at large. At the same time, platform businesses have become increasingly prominent within policy debates (Kiesling et al , 2019). This prompts the question of how and to what extent this potential could be leveraged in the energy sector to help drive the required transition to a low-carbon energy system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fall in transaction costs makes the integrated entity of a distribution company relatively more inefficient than alternatives such as the vertical disintegration of the distribution operator. Kiesling et al (2019, p. 34) argue that “as peer‐to‐peer transactions in energy capacity become more feasible, our results suggest that ownership of DER capacity will be driven less by one's expected intensity of use and more by relative price concerns and subjective preferences for energy self‐sufficiency or environmental attributes”.…”
Section: Reasons For Reconsidering the Regulation Of Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Advances in the financial and technological dimensions require changes in the tariff model as well. These advances in technology create the possibility of transforming electricity distribution into a platform market rather than being an integrated entity (Kiesling, Munger, & Theisen, 2019). The change in electricity markets can be seen as similar to developments in other platform markets.…”
Section: Reasons For Reconsidering the Regulation Of Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For service providers, a digital platform enables them to reach an extensive, even global, customer base (Parker et al, 2016). Here, digital platforms essentially create new markets by reducing transaction costs that previously made many economic interactions inefficient and costly through traditional market intermediaries, such as retailers (e.g., Kiesling et al, 2019). At the same time, digital platforms now oversee many transaction‐related factors (e.g., screening transaction partners) previously at the discretion of the transaction partners themselves (Lehdonvirta et al, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%