2014
DOI: 10.4236/jqis.2014.44023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From <i>E</i> = <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup> to <i>E</i> = <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup>/22—A Short Account of the Most Famous Equation in Physics and Its Hidden Quantum Entanglement Origin

Abstract: Einstein's energy mass formula is shown to consist of two basically quantum components E(O) = mc 2 /22 and E(D) = mc 2 (21/22). We give various arguments and derivations to expose the quantum entanglement physics residing inside a deceptively simple expression E = mc 2 . The true surprising aspect of the present work is however the realization that all the involved "physics" in deriving the new quantum dissection of Einstein's famous formula of special relativity is actually a pure mathematical necessity ancho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E = mc 2 is first not due to Einstein and second Albert Einstein is not responsible for all these misunderstandings in the first place. Subsequently we show that writing E = Kmc 2 is more general and accounts for the deeper meaning of Einstein's intention as well as for ordinary energy and dark energy by setting K = 1/22 for the first and K = 21/22 for the second so that at the end we find E = (mc 2 /22) + mc 2 (21/22) = mc 2 as should be [6] and in full agreement with cosmological measurements and observations which led twice to the Nobel Prize, once for COBE and the second in 2011 for Type 1a supernova and WMAP [6] [8] [13].…”
Section: Aboutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E = mc 2 is first not due to Einstein and second Albert Einstein is not responsible for all these misunderstandings in the first place. Subsequently we show that writing E = Kmc 2 is more general and accounts for the deeper meaning of Einstein's intention as well as for ordinary energy and dark energy by setting K = 1/22 for the first and K = 21/22 for the second so that at the end we find E = (mc 2 /22) + mc 2 (21/22) = mc 2 as should be [6] and in full agreement with cosmological measurements and observations which led twice to the Nobel Prize, once for COBE and the second in 2011 for Type 1a supernova and WMAP [6] [8] [13].…”
Section: Aboutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transferring this result to Kaluza-Klein "quantum" space-time we note that the "inner" volume must be correlated, i.e. intersectional which is appropriate for a volume and leads to [70] ( )…”
Section: E-infinity Particle-wave Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, E(O) is 4.5% of the total E and is the measured ordinary energy density of the cosmos while E(D) is 95.5% of the total E and represents the dark energy and dark matter density of the cosmos [70]. 8) The formal logic proposed by M.S.…”
Section: ) the Famous Einstein Equation E = MCmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular refs. [44]- [89] may be regarded as supplementary literature which may be skipped over at first reading and considered in depth only later at a second reading of the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%