2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From armchair to wheelchair: How patients with a locked-in syndrome integrate bodily changes in experienced identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation would be that the preference not to undergo life-prolonging treatment stems from the fear of a profound identity change due to modified body image. In other words, when healthy individuals would imagine their bodies severely paralyzed in LIS, they would report a discontinuity in their personal identity after the imagined acute loss of motor control [12]. However, patients' bodies continue to live after their accidents, implying that identity in patients in LIS is primarily socially constituted [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One explanation would be that the preference not to undergo life-prolonging treatment stems from the fear of a profound identity change due to modified body image. In other words, when healthy individuals would imagine their bodies severely paralyzed in LIS, they would report a discontinuity in their personal identity after the imagined acute loss of motor control [12]. However, patients' bodies continue to live after their accidents, implying that identity in patients in LIS is primarily socially constituted [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if quality of life is based on the perceived value of physical and mental functioning, it is possible that healthy subjects under-estimate patients with chronic disability. Indeed, studies show that, when partners or caregivers rate patients' quality of life, the scores are significantly lower than when patients do it for themselves [12][13][14][15][16][17]. In light of their severe disability, patients' higher self-ratings on quality of life measures is mostly known as the 'disability paradox' [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of making sense of this is by adopting what I would call a cognitive adaptation strategy. In a recent study, Nizzi et al (2012) conducted interviews with LIS patients to assess how the paralysis affected their sense of personal identity. They found that patients can adjust very well to the objective change in physiology and actually “feel the same as before the accident.” According to the authors, this is because the patients maintained a positive subjective “bodily representation” (p. 435).…”
Section: Toward Resolving the Body-social Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If positive quality of life has to do with a positive self representation then this adjustment strategy can explain why patients feel well despite the paralysis. However, Nizzi et al’s (2012) interpretation seems to presuppose a disembodied view of the self. Whether or not the body is subject to severe objective change plays no role for the patient’s self as long as she consciously decides that it does not.…”
Section: Toward Resolving the Body-social Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that nonmedical individuals, whose opinions are supposedly represented by media reports, may be biased towards residual cognitive function of patients with consciousness alterations. Such bias could be attributed to the fact that patients' quality of life evaluations are made from the perspective of healthy individuals who tend to underestimate patients' subjective well-being [48]. Indeed, we recently showed that patients in LIS expressed a positive subjective quality of life contrary to what could be expected in this condition [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%