2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From beat tracking to beat expectation: Cognitive-based beat tracking for capturing pulse clarity through time

Abstract: Pulse is the base timing to which western music is commonly notated, generally expressed by a listener by performing periodic taps with their hand or foot. This cognitive construction helps organize the perception of timed events in music and is the most basic expectation in rhythms. The analysis of expectations, and more specifically the strength with which the beat is felt—the pulse clarity—has been used to analyze affect in music. Most computational models of pulse clarity, and rhythmic expectation in gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem might be partially addressed by incorporating a model that evaluates multiple distinct hypotheses for beat or meter (e.g. [ 70 , 71 ], or [ 72 ] with appropriate probabilistic interpretation) as an additional level of inference in parallel with ongoing phase and tempo inference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem might be partially addressed by incorporating a model that evaluates multiple distinct hypotheses for beat or meter (e.g. [ 70 , 71 ], or [ 72 ] with appropriate probabilistic interpretation) as an additional level of inference in parallel with ongoing phase and tempo inference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beat perception is a high-level cognitive percept that cannot be directly extracted using music information retrieval approaches that use automated signal processing based mainly on one or more acoustic features (e.g., Lartillot, Eerola, Toiviainen, & Fornari, 2008;McKinney, Moelants, Davies, & Klapuri, 2007). Even when applying state-of-the art multi-model approaches, the models' output does not match human performance (except only under certain conditions), and their performance is significantly influenced by the musical style (Böck, Krebs, & Widmer, 2014) or beat interpretations of the rhythm (Miguel, Sigman, & Fernandez Slezak, 2020). We therefore, turned to experts-based annotation to index this percept (Figure 1).…”
Section: Annotation Of Temporal Predictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, one of the most significant and challenging tasks is that of time signature inference and beat tracking, especially in metrically ambiguous extracts, a common occurrence across genres [1]- [3]. Inaccurate beat tracking for performances with rubato (time-varying tempo) or multiple metric interpretations, regardless of the accuracy of note detections, will result in poor quality transcriptions given the misalignment of key rhythmic structures in the transcription [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, for methods that tackle time-varying time signatures using HMMs [10], [16] or RNNS [24], [39], the models employ cascade formats, such that joint beat and bar tracking is performed sequentially resulting in beat lengths independent of metric properties. The subjectivity of perceived pulse (beat) positions and lengths is addressed in literature through the employment of agents [5], [31], yet the process has not been generalised to joint time signature and beat tracking tasks. In general, the majority of algorithms assume either a constant tempo, beat length, or time signature division over time, providing methods for extracting each independently, and thus poor performance is reported for extracts with rubato and irregular beat and time signature changes [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%