1995
DOI: 10.2307/2393754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Chaos to Systems: The Engineering Foundations of Organization Theory, 1879-1932

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same vein, discourse analyses could be deployed to explore whether all participants feed from the same discursive sources or whether there is convergence from different sources. Small-group production (Cole, 1985) Accounting standards (Botzem & Quack, 2006;Perry & Noelke, 2005) Vesting Government HR practices (Scarbrough, 2002) Spread of engineering paradigm in management (Shenhav, 1995) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same vein, discourse analyses could be deployed to explore whether all participants feed from the same discursive sources or whether there is convergence from different sources. Small-group production (Cole, 1985) Accounting standards (Botzem & Quack, 2006;Perry & Noelke, 2005) Vesting Government HR practices (Scarbrough, 2002) Spread of engineering paradigm in management (Shenhav, 1995) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies of management innovations have found evidence in support of this hypothesis. For example, the fluctuation of reported labor union activities was positively associated with the popularity of systematic management between 1879 and 1932 (Shenhav, 1995). Similarly, Abrahamson (1997) found that recorded voluntary turnover was positively associated with the prevalence of human relations/personnel management discourse between 1875 and 1992.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Facts and narrative yield only the potential for more or less plausible accounts within networks. For example, while Shenhav's (1995;Shenhav and Weitz, 2000) otherwise useful relational account of the development of Taylorism is grounded in realist notions of the primacy of facts and a metaphysical notion of history as both real yet transcending human existence, for us the liberationary potential lies in freeing human action from the burden of how we believe history while simultaneously retaining our ability to capture what is important through stories and narratives over time.…”
Section: Towards An Epistemic Phase Of the Historical Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%