“…Figure 2 summarizes our results for the lowest energy phase considering spin-ordered phases (energy differences between all tested magnetic configurations and initial symmetries are given in Supplementary Table 6). Consistent with experiments and previous DFT theoretical literature 27–30,32,40,41,56 , for all explored compounds, we find (i) the correct low T crystal structure— orthorhombic for CaVO 3 , CaMnO 3 , LaMnO 3 , and LaFeO 3 ; monoclinic for LaVO 3 , CaFeO 3 , and YNiO 3 ; cubic for SrVO 3 ; (ii) the correct low T spin-ordered phase, including AFM (for YTiO 3 , LaVO 3 , CaMnO 3 , LaMnO 3 , LaFeO 3 , and YNiO 3 ) or FM (for YTiO 3 ) (except for CaFeO 3 that exhibits an incommensurate antiferromagnetic spin spiral order at low temperature 9 not included in our modeling); (iii) all compounds adopting a spin-ordered ground state (YTiO 3 , LaVO 3 , CaMnO 3 , LaMnO 3 , CaFeO 3 , LaFeO 3 , and YNiO 3 ) are predicted insulating. Furthermore, (iv) the key cell-internal lattice distortions (O 6 group rotations, Jahn–Teller distortions, and bond disproportionation) observed experimentally, are reproduced by theory with mode amplitudes in excellent agreement with experiments (see Supplementary Table 7).…”