2021
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202100928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Chlorinated Solvents to Branched Polyethylene: Solvent‐Induced Phase Separation for the Greener Processing of Semiconducting Polymers

Abstract: Despite having favorable optoelectronic and thermomechanical properties, the wide application of semiconducting polymers still suffers from limitations, particularly with regards to their processing in solution which necessitates toxic chlorinated solvents due to their intrinsic low solubility in common organic solvents. This work presents a novel greener approach to the fabrication of organic electronics without the use of toxic chlorinated solvents. Low‐molecular‐weight non‐toxic branched polyethylene (BPE) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in table 1, devices prepared from P(DPP-T) all showed good characteristics and transfer behavior. For the devices characterized after thermal annealing at 60 • C, an average charge mobility of 0.0138 cm 2 Vs −1 was measured, with an I on /I off of 10 4 and V th of −1.2 V. These results are comparable to previously reported charge mobilities for this polymer measured in TCBG OFETs on SiO 2 /Si++ substrate with an octadecyltrichlorosilane self-assembled monolayer [37,41]. Upon thermal annealing to 100 • C, the devices showed a similar charge mobility (0.023 cm 2 Vs −1 ) and on/off ratio.…”
Section: Evaluating Shellac As a Dielectric Materials In Ofet Devices...supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in table 1, devices prepared from P(DPP-T) all showed good characteristics and transfer behavior. For the devices characterized after thermal annealing at 60 • C, an average charge mobility of 0.0138 cm 2 Vs −1 was measured, with an I on /I off of 10 4 and V th of −1.2 V. These results are comparable to previously reported charge mobilities for this polymer measured in TCBG OFETs on SiO 2 /Si++ substrate with an octadecyltrichlorosilane self-assembled monolayer [37,41]. Upon thermal annealing to 100 • C, the devices showed a similar charge mobility (0.023 cm 2 Vs −1 ) and on/off ratio.…”
Section: Evaluating Shellac As a Dielectric Materials In Ofet Devices...supporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, to achieve the use of shellac on paper substrates, this initial investigation on silicon wafer is crucial to establish the fabrication procedures and confirm the compatibility of shellac with other device components. For this initial investigation, two DPP-based polymers, namely P(DPP-T) and P(DPP-TVT) were used as the semiconductor material and prepared following previously reported procedures [35][36][37]. P(DPP-T) was chosen given its low Young's modulus and high solubility (ease of processing) and P(DPP-TVT) was selected due to its high charge-carrier mobility in OFETs.…”
Section: Evaluating Shellac As a Dielectric Materials In Ofet Devices...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of printed devices include printed antennas, , sensors, and displays , for applications in inventory and package tracking, antitheft and counterfeiting, food quality monitoring, , and pharmaceutical dose tracking . The extensive applicability and short lifetime of smart packaging will profoundly accelerate an already mature electronic waste (e-waste) problem. Research efforts have focused on developing green conductive inks and ink processing alternatives; however, poly­(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) has dominated as the substrate of choice for printed electronics because of its smoothness and flexibility, despite its substantial contribution to the weight of a printed device and its environmental persistence. ,, Paper is a promising green substrate for disposable electronics: It is sourced from renewable materials, is biodegradable, and has established recycling procedures. Paper is significantly lower cost (∼10 cents/m 2 ) compared to PET (∼2 dollars/m 2 ), it is compatible with high-throughput roll-to-roll (R2R) printing, and it can also withstand higher processing temperatures than plastic substrates .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%