2015
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2015.1115005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From commodification to weaponization: the Russian language as ‘pride’ and ‘profit’ in Russia's transnational discourses

Abstract: The article expands the debate about the interaction and conflict of linguistic commodification with other values attached to a language. It interrogates Russian dominant discourse produced between 2010-2015, focusing on how it attributes the values of 'pride' and 'profit' to the Russian language in three transnational contexts: the narrative of 'compatriots' outside Russia, the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union and the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It argues that the discursive construction of R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further considerations make it seem likely that the perception of the war in Donbas as a war caused by Russia led to an increase in prejudice against Russian speakers. In the context of the annexation of Crimea and the events in Donbas, many have argued that Russian speakers were used to legitimate the Russian engagement (Hutchings and Szostek 2015, 190; Ryazanova-Clarke 2017, 451). Officials from the Russian Federation emphasized the threat to Russian speakers and Russia’s responsibility for its compatriots [sootechestvenniki ] in Ukraine.…”
Section: What Might Have Changed Prejudice Against Russian Speakers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further considerations make it seem likely that the perception of the war in Donbas as a war caused by Russia led to an increase in prejudice against Russian speakers. In the context of the annexation of Crimea and the events in Donbas, many have argued that Russian speakers were used to legitimate the Russian engagement (Hutchings and Szostek 2015, 190; Ryazanova-Clarke 2017, 451). Officials from the Russian Federation emphasized the threat to Russian speakers and Russia’s responsibility for its compatriots [sootechestvenniki ] in Ukraine.…”
Section: What Might Have Changed Prejudice Against Russian Speakers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This must be logical reasoning, especially in light of Russia’s hostile attitude to the West (Ryazanova-Clarke, 2017a), a policy not supported by Kazakhstan. The expert therefore emphasizes the need to avoid it, using the topos of culture : as the Russian culture is characterized as chauvinistic, one should restrict its influence by means of distancing oneself from the script.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Это хорошо видно, к примеру, в коммодификации русского языка на Кипре и в других излюбленных туристических дестинациях россиян, где в основе популярности русского языка лежат сугубо экономические мотивы, сочетаясь порой со скрытым негативным отношением к самим россиянам (см., напр. : [Pavlenko, 2012;Ryazanova-Clarke, Muth, 2015]). В исследовании С. Мута также говорится о том, что Литва стала популярной дестинацией для русскоязычных медицинских туристов по причине прибыльности рынка медицинского туризма, экономического кризиса и демографических изменений в стране, и это произошло несмотря на частую демонстрацию националистических идеологий в политических дискурсах в Литве .…”
Section: The Linguistic Landscape Of the Mongolian Capital Ulaanbaata...unclassified