From Complex Interventions to Complex Systems: Using Social Network Analysis to Understand School Engagement with Health and Wellbeing

Abstract

Challenges in changing school system functioning to orient them towards health are commonly underestimated. Understanding the social interactions of school staff from a complex systems perspective may provide valuable insight into how system dynamics may impede or facilitate the promotion of health and wellbeing. Ego social network analysis was employed with wellbeing leads within four diverse case study schools to identify variability in embeddedness of health and wellbeing roles. This variation, as well as the broader context, was then explored through semi-structured qualitative interviews with school staff and a Healthy Schools Coordinator, sampled from the wellbeing leads’ ego-networks. Networks varied in terms of perceived importance and frequency of interactions, centrality, brokerage and cliques. Case study schools that showed higher engagement with health and wellbeing had highly organised, distributed leadership structures, dedicated wellbeing roles, senior leadership support and outside agencies embedded within school systems. Allocation of responsibility for wellbeing to a member of the senior leadership team alongside a distributed leadership approach may facilitate the reorientation of school systems towards health and wellbeing. Ego-network analysis to understand variance in complex school system starting points could be replicated on a larger scale and utilised to design complex interventions.

The sustainability of public health interventions in schools: a systematic review

“…Second is the importance of supporting staff who are confident in delivering health promotion and believe in its value. These facilitators are consistent with studies of the implementation of school health interventions [13,31,67], suggesting factors are crucial to both phases.…”

Use of School Wellness Policy Templates in One Texas Public Health Region: A Mixed‐Methods Analysis

“…Specific actions that can help teachers to advocate for wellness training include: Have district leadership use formal and informal communication processes to engage teachers in the discussion and selection of SWP goals. Identify free and low‐cost professional development opportunities for nutrition education and physical activity that can be provided to school staff via virtual teaching methods. At the school/district level, we found that general/academic leaders are often responsible for monitoring the implementation of the SWP. Although inclusion of general/academic leaders is important for the success of school health programming, distribution of leaders among multiple stakeholders, including nutrition and physical education staff, can help orient districts toward wellness 33 . Additionally, in Texas, school health advisory committees play an important role in setting/evaluating district‐level health priorities, which suggest that they could play a larger role in monitoring SWPs.…”

Psychological Strategies and Protocols for Promoting School Well-Being: A Systematic Review

“…Most studies found a negative association between student–teacher relationships (STR) and the risk factor of dropping out ( Lee and Burkam, 2003 ; Murray and Malmgren, 2005 ; Barile et al, 2011 ; Bergeron et al, 2011 ; Wang et al, 2013 ; Frostad et al, 2014 ; Littlecott et al, 2019 ; Song, 2021 ; Zheng, 2021 ). This means that in schools where there is a positive STR, there are low dropout rates.…”