DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Conceptual Structures to Semantic Interoperability of Content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can examine various interoperability levels [25][26][27][28][29], but since syntactic and semantic levels are particularly essential for data integration, we focus on these two levels. Syntactic interoperability is concerned with software infrastructure needed, whereas semantic level addresses the meaning of data while sharing or exchanging data between systems [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can examine various interoperability levels [25][26][27][28][29], but since syntactic and semantic levels are particularly essential for data integration, we focus on these two levels. Syntactic interoperability is concerned with software infrastructure needed, whereas semantic level addresses the meaning of data while sharing or exchanging data between systems [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, they need to represent these resources using the same data representation format to be understandable for both applications. For example, using RDF, and OWL [13]. The size and scope of the learning resources (learning contents) that we can combine to a bigger content package is a key point to consider.…”
Section: Figure 1: Learning Contents Granularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was firstly developed to be applied in military simulation systems within the U.S. Department of Defense but has been successfully applied in different domains as U.S. Department of Energy solutions for the power-grid [GridWise 2007]. Also, it was featured as a reference model in several contributions, such as [Tolk et al 2007], [Dobrev et al 2007], [Zeigler et al 2007] and [Morris et al 2004].…”
Section: Levels Of Conceptual Interoperability Model (Lcim)mentioning
confidence: 99%