ABSTRACT. Decisions about instructional methods are becoming more complex, with options ranging from problem sets to experiential service learning projects. However, instructors not trained in instructional design may make these important decisions based on convenience, comfort, or trends. Instead, this paper draws on the knowledge management literature and specifically the knowledge-in-practice framework to develop a theoretical process for choosing instructional methods. This process classifies the underlying knowledge structure of learning objectives along the dimensions of tacitness and learnability, then matches the knowledge structure with instructional methods that will be the most appropriate fit for students working towards that learning objective. We propose that the integration of knowledge management with instructional design offers valuable insights into the process of choosing appropriate instructional methods, and our framework can help instructors determine which instructional methods are the best match for their learning objectives.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AS KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: A KNOWLEDGE-IN-PRACTICE APPROACH TO CHOOSING APPROPRIATE
INSTRUCTIONAL METHODSThis is a pre-publication version of the following article:McIver, D., Fitzsimmons, S., and Flanagan, D. (2015
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AS KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT:A KNOWLEDGE-IN-PRACTICE APPROACH TO CHOOSING INSTRUCTIONAL
METHODSAs management instructors, when we are offered a new course, it can feel like we are being given a blank slate. Beyond developing learning objectives, we must design instructional methods that will help students achieve those objectives (Reigeluth & Carr-Chellman, 2009b).Instructional design decisions are critical, yet the abundance of choice can be overwhelming.Some instructors may stick with the tried and true, using face-to-face lectures and individual assignments. Others may be drawn to newer methods, such as simulations, service learning and internship-based education. We argue that current frameworks, including the dominant Bloom's taxonomy, usually end with learning objectives, a step prior to the final step of choosing instructional methods (Bloom, Engelhart, Furst, Hill, & Krathwohl, 1956). This challenge is metaphorically related to the last-mile challenge of package delivery services; they can move packages to within a mile of the end destination relatively efficiently, compared to the resources expended to move packages the last mile. In the same way, instructors now have guidance shaping instructional design up until the point of choosing among instructional methods, yet that final decision is crucial to the success of all previous decisions. Instructional methods ought to be applied mindfully, based on an understanding of each method's appropriateness with respect to the intended learning objectives, yet frameworks give minimal guidance on how to make these decisions. Given the current profusion of instructional method options, instructors would benefit from a theory-based rationale for determining which instruct...