2016
DOI: 10.18251/ijme.v18i3.1224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Contagious to Resilient and Beyond: A Periodization of Four Decades of Educational Research on LGBTQ Issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In future research, it may be beneficial to assess pre-existing frames. Kavanagh (2016) examined how common cultural frames of homosexuality influenced bullied LGBTQ youth. She found that from the 1980s onward LGBTQ youth were considered “at risk,” from the early 2000s onward they were often conceptualized as bullying victims, then from around 2005 onward, they were conceptualized more and more as resilient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In future research, it may be beneficial to assess pre-existing frames. Kavanagh (2016) examined how common cultural frames of homosexuality influenced bullied LGBTQ youth. She found that from the 1980s onward LGBTQ youth were considered “at risk,” from the early 2000s onward they were often conceptualized as bullying victims, then from around 2005 onward, they were conceptualized more and more as resilient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She found that from the 1980s onward LGBTQ youth were considered “at risk,” from the early 2000s onward they were often conceptualized as bullying victims, then from around 2005 onward, they were conceptualized more and more as resilient. These cultural frames of LGBTQ youth influenced how those who were victims of bullying perceived their own situation and their future trajectory (Kavanagh, 2016; Russell, 2005). Individuals both inside and outside the LGBTQ community most likely grew up in homes with diverse frames of bullying such as whether the victim of bullying is at fault for being bullied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For point 1, “respects the humanity of each person,” Dr. Willis calls attention to histories of racial sciences that impact conceptions of literacy today, and she highlights the contingent nature of “being human” for so many of us. For queer and trans individuals sitting at various intersections of race, class, ability, and more, interwoven sciences of “race” and “sex” have inscribed our communities within research literature as pathologically unwell and, moreover, as inhuman (Kavanagh, 2016). I wonder then what an unwavering, felt sense of shared humanity would feel like in our research communities, and how might that inspirit scholarship that advances the pursuit of feeling human on a global scale?…”
Section: Pursuing Immanence In a Transcendent Approach To Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%