Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2207750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From death to final disposition

Abstract: In this paper, we describe collaborative processes and stakeholders involved in the period from when a person dies until they are laid to rest: the funeral, final disposition of the body, and (in some circumstances) victim identification. The rich mixture of technologies currently deployed during this brief period are categorized and critically analyzed. We then reflect on the implications of our findings, both for the design of technology that takes the end of life into account, and for the wider HCI communit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to logistical concerns relating to the transmission of passwords and data, there are also broader changes that should be considered regarding inheritance and dying in the digital age. These include novel approaches to designing for digital remembrance [3], digital archiving of sentimental objects [23], new ways of social mourning [15,51], the stakeholders involved immediately following death [32], and the extension and preservation of personhood through technology [28,50]. Underlying this are questions regarding what is the nature of privacy after death, which is typically not treated with the same reverance as privacy during life [12].…”
Section: Data After Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to logistical concerns relating to the transmission of passwords and data, there are also broader changes that should be considered regarding inheritance and dying in the digital age. These include novel approaches to designing for digital remembrance [3], digital archiving of sentimental objects [23], new ways of social mourning [15,51], the stakeholders involved immediately following death [32], and the extension and preservation of personhood through technology [28,50]. Underlying this are questions regarding what is the nature of privacy after death, which is typically not treated with the same reverance as privacy during life [12].…”
Section: Data After Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inheritors may not know what accounts the deceased held online, or what the user ids and passwords are. If the deceased maintained an online address book -for example, in an email contact list -it can even be difficult to notify social network members of the person's death and funeral (Moncur et al 2012).…”
Section: Inheritance and Repurposingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orders of service incorporate images of the deceased (Walter et al 2012). PowerPoint is used to co-ordinate the display of photos and video clips during the service, against a backdrop of the deceased's favourite tunes culled from their MP3 player (Moncur et al 2012). In the longer term, the bereaved are reusing existing digital data to create their own technology-based responses to death and loss, such as online memorials (Hume & Bressers 2009;Nager & Vries 2004).…”
Section: Inheritance and Repurposingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsoft Memory Box), there is not yet an agreed mechanism or model which provides a suitable way to prepare for digital information bequests. 10 However, there is growing recognition that new digital hoarding practices will lead to serious problems in managing one"s digital legacy.…”
Section: Our Digital Footprintmentioning
confidence: 99%