From design for manufacturing (DFM) to manufacturing for design (MFD) via hybrid manufacturing and smart factory: A review and perspective of paradigm shift

Chu, Wujin; Kim, Min‐Soo; Jang, Ki-Hwan; Song, Jae Bok; Rodrigue, Hugo; Chun, Doo‐Man; Cho, Young Tae; Ko, Seung Hwan; Cho, Kyu-Jin; Won, Suk; Min, Sangkee; Jeong, Sungho; Jeong, Haedo; Lee, Choon-Man; Chu, Chong Nam

doi:10.1007/s40684-016-0028-0

Cited by 67 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 138 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Digitization and networking technologies can also improve product life cycle management and recycling processes, resulting in lower resource consumption and less waste [63][64][65]. This also applies to the recycling of raw materials and tools, and the retrofitting of machines [66].…”

Section: State Of Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of "Industry 4.0" is expected to bring a multitude of benefits for industrial value creation. However, the associated risks hamper its implementation and lack a comprehensive overview. In response, the paper proposes a framework of risks in the context of Industry 4.0 that is related to the Triple Bottom Line of sustainability. The framework is developed from a literature review, as well as from 14 in-depth expert interviews. With respect to economic risks, the risks that are associated with high or false investments are outlined, as well as the threatened business models and increased competition from new market entrants. From an ecological perspective, the increased waste and energy consumption, as well as possible ecological risks related to the concept "lot size one", are described. From a social perspective, the job losses, risks associated with organizational transformation, and employee requalification, as well as internal resistance, are among the aspects that are considered. Additionally, risks can be associated with technical risks, e.g., technical integration, information technology (IT)-related risks such as data security, and legal and political risks, such as for instance unsolved legal clarity in terms of data possession. Conclusively, the paper discusses the framework with the extant literature, proposes managerial and theoretical implications, and suggests avenues for future research.

show abstract

Section: State Of Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…31 On the methodological level Chu et al introduce a future paradigm called Manufacturing for Design which uses hybrid manufacturing and smart factory as underlying technologies. 32 Zhao et al analyse the sustainability impact of manufacturing by introducing a new information model for product lifecycle management that integrates an energy simulation framework. 33 Generally, it must be said, the novelty of the concept of Industrie 4.0 means that there is very little research addressing the impacts of digitalizing and interconnecting industrial processes on sustainability aspects such as resource efficiency potentials.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry – A comparative study from China and Germany

Beier

Niehoff

Ziems

et al. 2017

Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech.

196

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industrial production is currently undergoing a fundamental transformation, leading towards a digitalized and interconnected industrial production, which is subsumed under the term Industrial Internet (of Things) or Industrie 4.0. This paper discusses the changes that digitalization is expected to bring about in the industrial sector by comparing a highly industrialized (Germany) with a major emerging industrial economy (China). We conducted two empirical surveys asking manufacturing companies from different sectors in Germany and China respectively, how they expect the digitalization of their processes will affect them. Both questionnaires addressed the future of work in production and the future of production itself. The main contribution of this paper is its empirical investigation of how the digitalization of industry is likely to affect sustainability aspects of manufacturing companies in two countries with very different industrial structures. Our findings suggest that this transformation will not only impact the ecological dimension (resource efficiency, renewable energy), but that the technical transformation is likely to be accompanied by social transformations.The findings of this paper will help decision-makers in the political sphere to anticipate and shape pathways towards a more sustainable future in the industrial sector.

show abstract

“…Production paradigms are and have always been shaped by different factors, i.e. sociological, economic and technological (Chu et al 2016). Sinsel et al (2017) and Magone (2016) found that the main perspective in Industry 4.0 is a technological perspective.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart Factories from Business, Management and Accounting Perspective: A Systemic Analysis of Current Research

Jerman¹,

Dominici²

2018

MNG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate to what extent smart factories have been addressed in the research in the business, management and accounting field and to identify possible gaps in the current research. The bibliographic units from the Scopus database on the keyword 'smart factory,' limited to the business, management and accounting research field was searched.In order to answer research questions, a bibliometric analysis and the data mining was performed. From the text of founded articles, gaps in the current research were searched in order to provide guidance for future research directions. There is a growing trend on the smart factory topic, but they are mostly connected with the field of engineering, decision-making, or computer science. Fields most explored are management of supply chains, changes in business models, individualization of production system and business processes optimization. The important gap is the lack of studies in the field of human resources management.

show abstract

From design for manufacturing (DFM) to manufacturing for design (MFD) via hybrid manufacturing and smart factory: A review and perspective of paradigm shift

Cited by 67 publications

References 138 publications

Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers

Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers

Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry – A comparative study from China and Germany

Smart Factories from Business, Management and Accounting Perspective: A Systemic Analysis of Current Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About