2014
DOI: 10.3390/antib3010130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Donor to Recipient: Current Questions Relating to Humoral Alloimmunization

Abstract: Alloimmunization is an undesirable iatrogenic effect of transfusion and transplantation. In fact, recipients can be considered as responders or not responders, in a continuum from tolerance, including organ transplantation and transfusion, to polyimmunized and refractory patients. New models and large studies have enabled a better understanding of the mechanisms that induce specific alloantibody (alloAb) generation. Here, we focus on risk factors of alloimmunization. We review the alloantibody characteristics,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not examined in the present study, it is known that IgG subclasses have different C1q-binding affinities, with most potent binding for IgG3 followed by IgG1, which is predominant, very weak binding for IgG2, and no binding for IgG4 [24]. However, the underlying cause of immunization (pregnancy, blood cell transfusion, grafting) was reported to have a low impact on the subclass repartition [25,26]. Therefore, it is supposed that the amounts of IgG, represented by the MFI, mainly influence the interaction with C1q.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Although not examined in the present study, it is known that IgG subclasses have different C1q-binding affinities, with most potent binding for IgG3 followed by IgG1, which is predominant, very weak binding for IgG2, and no binding for IgG4 [24]. However, the underlying cause of immunization (pregnancy, blood cell transfusion, grafting) was reported to have a low impact on the subclass repartition [25,26]. Therefore, it is supposed that the amounts of IgG, represented by the MFI, mainly influence the interaction with C1q.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A blood product is composed of three distinct parts (1): the desired product, such as red blood cells (RBCs) or platelets (2); excipients (e.g. anticoagulant or residual plasma) (3); residual leukocytes that carry HLA antigens, and in rare cases unexpected residual cells, such as platelets in red blood cells products (15). Leukocytes carry most of the antigenic load in a blood unit, yet the systematic use of leukoreduction process implemented in the late 90's to fight against Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease transmission dramatically reduced the amount of WBC into blood units (16,17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enfin, on a enfin remarqué -et ce, de façon très sensible -l'amélioration des conditions de confort des transfusions, avec moins de réactions fébriles non hémoly-tiques (RFNH) et de manifestations de type allergique, et donc inflammatoires. La leucoréduction astringente réduit les cas d'allo-immunisation, non pas seulement contre les Ag strictement (HNA) ou préférentiellement (HLA) leucocytaires, mais aussi contre les allo-Ag érythrocytaires et plaquettaires (HPA) [31][32][33].…”
Section: Les Leucocytesunclassified