2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12193184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Drones to Phenotype: Using UAV-LiDAR to Detect Species and Provenance Variation in Tree Productivity and Structure

Abstract: The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for remote sensing of natural environments has increased over the last decade. However, applications of this technology for high-throughput individual tree phenotyping in a quantitative genetic framework are rare. We here demonstrate a two-phased analytical pipeline that rapidly phenotypes and filters for genetic signals in traditional and novel tree productivity and architectural traits derived from ultra-dense light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point clouds. The go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation results achieved for the four structural traits measured in the field were in strong agreement with the results previously obtained on a larger subset of the same restoration experiment using LiDAR mounted on a unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) [11] and, more generally, with the broader ZEB1 literature [17,18,29]. Consistent with previous observations [11], crown insertion height was difficult to validate. This was largely attributed to the nature of these restoration species, with crowns extending to the bottom of the stem in many cases, making the separation from the underlying grassy layer particularly difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The validation results achieved for the four structural traits measured in the field were in strong agreement with the results previously obtained on a larger subset of the same restoration experiment using LiDAR mounted on a unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) [11] and, more generally, with the broader ZEB1 literature [17,18,29]. Consistent with previous observations [11], crown insertion height was difficult to validate. This was largely attributed to the nature of these restoration species, with crowns extending to the bottom of the stem in many cases, making the separation from the underlying grassy layer particularly difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Two additional measures related to crown properties were also ground-truthed in this study: field-measured crown width was highly correlated with crown width at the widest cross-section (R 2 = 0.84, RMSE = 0.53 m (2018); R 2 = 0.85, RMSE = 0.52 m (2019)), while field-measurements of crown insertion height were poorly correlated with a LiDAR composite value (R 2 = 0.18, RMSE = 0.29 m (2018); R 2 = 0.09, RMSE = 0.30 m (2019)). This composite value derived from LiDAR was obtained after running a random forest model following Camarretta et al [11], fitting the 99th height percentile, diameter, rumple index, and height to the widest cross-section as predictors of the field measured insertion height.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Torresan et al [24] applied a dense UAV-LS point cloud collected in a dense mixed forest in Italy, and showed the under-segmentation of small understorey trees. However, Camarretta et al [25] used UAV-LS data to model DBH across all size-classes in a restored Eucalypt forest in Tasmania, Australia. Using crown diameter and height as predictor variables, they observed an R 2 of 0.8 between measured and modelled DBH, demonstrating the potential of UAV-LS to produce accurate individual tree level DBH predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%