2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From ear to eye? No effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on human pupil dilation: A report of three studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
52
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
12
52
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This result could be especially useful during 'transcutaneous' VNS (t-VNS) [38], which involves electrically stimulating the nerve's cervical or auricular branches close to the surface of the skin. However, it was recently reported that t-VNS through its auricular branch did not affect pupil size [39][40][41]. The discrepancy between these findings and ours suggests that the transcutaneous protocol in those studies likely insufficiently stimulated the vagus nerve, perhaps due to the site of stimulation (auricular vs cervical branches), the chosen stimulation parameters (pulse amplitude, width, rate) or stimulation duration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…This result could be especially useful during 'transcutaneous' VNS (t-VNS) [38], which involves electrically stimulating the nerve's cervical or auricular branches close to the surface of the skin. However, it was recently reported that t-VNS through its auricular branch did not affect pupil size [39][40][41]. The discrepancy between these findings and ours suggests that the transcutaneous protocol in those studies likely insufficiently stimulated the vagus nerve, perhaps due to the site of stimulation (auricular vs cervical branches), the chosen stimulation parameters (pulse amplitude, width, rate) or stimulation duration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…This result could be especially useful during "transcutaneous" VNS (t-VNS) 38 , which involves electrically stimulating the nerve's cervical or auricular branches close to the surface of the skin. However, it was recently reported that t-VNS through its auricular branch did not affect pupil size [39][40][41] . The discrepancy between these findings and ours suggest that the transcutaneous protocol in those studies likely insufficiently stimulated the vagus nerve, perhaps due to the site of stimulation (auricular vs cervical branches), the chosen stimulation parameters (pulse amplitude, width, rate), or stimulation duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is not clear whether DCCS demands more flexible attention than NLT, and whether the difference between the two could only be observed because tVNS evokes a stronger release of norepinephrine, engaging α-1 receptors that were necessary for the DCCS but less so for the NLT. Hence, it is recommended for future studies to address the possible specific efficacy of tVNS by considering an on-line measurement of norepinephrine such as pupillary responses (Warren et al, 2018;Keute et al, 2019b;Burger et al, 2020). This approach might complement and further specify the hypotheses based on the neurovisceral integration model (Thayer et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%