2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From epigenetic landscape to phenotypic fitness landscape: Evolutionary effect of pathogens on host traits

Abstract: The epigenetic landscape illustrates how cells differentiate through the control of gene regulatory networks. Numerous studies have investigated epigenetic gene regulation but there are limited studies on how the epigenetic landscape and the presence of pathogens influence the evolution of host traits. Here, we formulate a multistable decision-switch model involving several phenotypes with the antagonistic influence of parasitism. As expected, pathogens can drive dominant (common) phenotypes to become inferior… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, GFG and range (unidirectional) models generally include trade‐offs (see ‘Pleiotropy and trade‐offs’) and types vary in their degree of generalism. These models can therefore produce a far broader range of outcomes, with stable monomorphic or polymorphic populations in either population (Ashby et al, 2019 ; Cortez et al, 2017 ; Fenton et al, 2009 ; Tellier & Brown, 2007a ), rapid oscillations occurring within levels of specialism (driven by negative frequency‐dependent selection) or slower oscillations occurring between levels of specialism (driven by trade‐offs) (Ashby & Boots, 2017 ). Moreover, the oscillations tend to be either stable limit cycles or damped cycles and are not structurally unstable as is common in matching models (Best et al, 2017 ; Kawecki, 1998 ; Kwiatkowski et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Key Features Of Models Of Host–parasite Coevolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, GFG and range (unidirectional) models generally include trade‐offs (see ‘Pleiotropy and trade‐offs’) and types vary in their degree of generalism. These models can therefore produce a far broader range of outcomes, with stable monomorphic or polymorphic populations in either population (Ashby et al, 2019 ; Cortez et al, 2017 ; Fenton et al, 2009 ; Tellier & Brown, 2007a ), rapid oscillations occurring within levels of specialism (driven by negative frequency‐dependent selection) or slower oscillations occurring between levels of specialism (driven by trade‐offs) (Ashby & Boots, 2017 ). Moreover, the oscillations tend to be either stable limit cycles or damped cycles and are not structurally unstable as is common in matching models (Best et al, 2017 ; Kawecki, 1998 ; Kwiatkowski et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Key Features Of Models Of Host–parasite Coevolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical modelling is very useful in understanding host–parasite interaction and diseases [ 6 , 29 31 ]. The phenotype decision-switch network in figure 1 is used to illustrate the interaction among host phenotypes and parasites and the effect of antibiotic [ 25 ]. Here, the expression of host phenotype 1 (H1) inhibits the expression of host phenotype 2 (H2), and vice versa.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-host type competition characterizes evolutionary selection among host types (genotype or phenotype) that will be commonly expressed in the host population. In multi-type host–parasite systems, multiple host types may coexist, but if canonical Red Queen dynamics arises, only one host type is common/dominant for a certain period of time [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models can be used for predicting scenarios and in prescribing solutions to problems (Rabajante 2020 ; Choudhury et al 2018 ; Ferrett et al 2020 ; Cortez 2017 ), such as addressing the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the simulations and risk assessment, several recommendations are suggested to inhibit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, especially in health care facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%