2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From farm scale synergies to village scale trade-offs: Cereal crop residues use in an agro-pastoral system of the Sudanian zone of Burkina Faso

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…credit) and markets for inputs and outputs. Food self-sufficiency can be assessed either by measuring the number of months per year when the household is food self-sufficient (Tittonell et al, 2010;Valbuena et al, 2014) or by comparing the sum of basic energy requirements of the different members of the household to on-farm cereal production (Andrieu et al, 2015;Paassen et al, 2011;Tittonell et al, 2009). …”
Section: Description Of the Different Steps Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…credit) and markets for inputs and outputs. Food self-sufficiency can be assessed either by measuring the number of months per year when the household is food self-sufficient (Tittonell et al, 2010;Valbuena et al, 2014) or by comparing the sum of basic energy requirements of the different members of the household to on-farm cereal production (Andrieu et al, 2015;Paassen et al, 2011;Tittonell et al, 2009). …”
Section: Description Of the Different Steps Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulations, it is assumed that fields are also weeded at the beginning of crop growth and that each hole has three plants after thinning. Under these conditions, simulated plant densities are set to 10,000plants ha −1 at the lowest and reach up to 50,000 plants ha −1 , in agreement with previous studies in southwestern Niger (Buerkert et al ., ; Saidou et al ., ; Marteau et al ., ), although these values are relatively high for the study site strictly speaking (Hiernaux & Turner, ). Use of manure: Manuring is a common practice in the study area (de Ridder et al ., ; Andrieu et al ., ; Valbuena et al ., ); its effects on soil fertility in the model are expressed by modifying the coefficient of vegetation production in SarraH. Crop residue management: Three crop residue management practices are simulated based on observations in southwestern Niger (e.g., Akponikpe et al ., ): collection (to be used as forage) or flattening of (i) none, (ii) half, or (iii) all of the residues after harvest. Fields are cleared (i.e., remaining standing vegetation is laid down as litter) at different dates during the dry season, until the latest possible (in June) just before the start of the following rainy season. Grazing: In the simulations, grazing pressure ranges between no grazing and 50 TLU km −2 (tropical livestock units).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sudanian and Sahelian agro-ecosystems such factors refer chiefly to rainfall variability (Traore et al 2013) and soil fertility (de Ridder et al 2004), in combination with the constraints that are a result of the particular patterns of communal natural resource management in the West African village territories (Achard and Banoin 2003;Andrieu et al 2015). Current assessments of yield variability and yield gaps with respect to exploitable and water-limited crop yield potentials indicate that gaps are widest in smallholder family agriculture (van Ittersum et al 2013), particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (Tittonell and Giller 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%