Impairment on the move: The disabled incomer and other invalidating intersections IntroductionAt the meeting point of disabled and migrant identities there is, on the part of many normate/host communities, a clearly articulated sensibility of closure and repatriation. Jennifer Harris ( 2003) described the experience of disabled asylum seekers in the UK in terms of the aphorism; 'all doors are closed to us'. At a global level, the number of closed doors multiplies significantly. The numbers on the move, traversing significant geographical distances, in order to resettle, is historically unprecedented (Castles and Miller 2003: Marfleet 2006). The World Health Organisation estimates that disabled people account for 7 -10% of the world's population. This suggests that there are 4.4 to 6.2 million disabled people among the world's 65.3 million forcibly displaced persons (UNHCR 2016). It is not yet common practice, however, to 'include people with disabilities among those considered as particularly vulnerable in disasters and displacement and who, therefore, require targeted response' (Couldrey and Herson 2010: 2). Social amnesia about disability amongst the 'normate' community is common.Globalisation has triggered extraordinary human mobility (Bauman 1998: Marfleet 2006 reshaping patterns of inclusion and exclusion (Gaventa and Tandon 2010). In this contemporary tale -unmatched in scale -of diasporas and uprooted lives, disabled migrants are 'the most invisible' (Boylan 1991). Usually, represented as a byword for immobility, disabled people, like millions of their non-disabled counterparts, are on the move. The struggle for citizenship and inclusion that has marked the social movement of disabled people in the 20 th and early 21 st centuries, has to be, for many millions, replayed anew in new polities where the rights of 'strangers', 'incomers, 'aliens' are anything but secure.