2009
DOI: 10.1080/01436590902742297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Fields of Power to Fields of Sweat: the dual process of constructing temporary migrant labour in Mexico and Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
69
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Large commercial establishments, sometimes with hundreds of SAWP employees and lucrative corporate chain contracts, benefit from the same access to the dependable ideal migrant worker labor force as do the smaller operations. The SAWP thus does not lessen, and may even facilitate, the replacement of small farms by large corporate operations (see Binford 2010). 9.…”
Section: Consequences Of Performing Subordinationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Large commercial establishments, sometimes with hundreds of SAWP employees and lucrative corporate chain contracts, benefit from the same access to the dependable ideal migrant worker labor force as do the smaller operations. The SAWP thus does not lessen, and may even facilitate, the replacement of small farms by large corporate operations (see Binford 2010). 9.…”
Section: Consequences Of Performing Subordinationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…12. See Basok (2002), Binford (2002), Preibisch and Binford (2007), and Satzewich (2007) for further analyses of why Mexican labor has grown in the SAWP. 13.…”
Section: Consequences Of Performing Subordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, it perpetuates their ‘deportability’, which De Genova () associates with the threat of deportation. In the case of SAWP employees, in a twist on this notion, Binford (, 508) helpfully suggests that deportability is also maintained by officials in sending states who may dismiss (i.e. expel or deport) workers from a future in Canada on the basis of negative employer evaluations, distinguishing De Genova's original concept from the insecurities posed by deportation per se to encompass explicit and implicit threats on the part of both sending and host states .…”
Section: Canada's Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program and The Role mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features of the TFWP make it difficult for farmemployer during the growing season (e.g., transfers), the total number of SAWP positions reported in this table does not reflect the actual number of seasonal workers in Canada during that period." workers to refuse employer requests for long hours or high-risk work (Binford, 2009). While researchers have documented cases of migrant farmworkers who have worked seasonally in Canada as long as three decades (Preibisch, 2012), migrants are denied access to permanent residency or citizenship and the numerous rights, entitlements, and social recognition associated with a more secure immigration status.…”
Section: Migrant Farmworker Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%