2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7015-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Gene Annotation to Function Prediction for Metagenomics

Abstract: Microbes play important roles in almost every aspect of life, including human health and diseases. Facilitated by the rapid development of sequencing technologies, metagenomics research has accelerated the accumulation of genomic sequences of microbial species that had been inaccessible before. Analysis of the metagenomic sequencing data can reveal not only the species but also the functional composition of microbial communities. Here, we report a pipeline for functional annotation of metagenomic datasets. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared our pipeline to two recently published metagenome annotation tools, Fun4Me ( 38 ) and ShotMAP ( 39 ), using the above-described artificial metagenome. Note that Fun4Me includes its own reference database, which cannot be changed on demand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compared our pipeline to two recently published metagenome annotation tools, Fun4Me ( 38 ) and ShotMAP ( 39 ), using the above-described artificial metagenome. Note that Fun4Me includes its own reference database, which cannot be changed on demand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, several pipelines were set up that integrate some of these and other previously mentioned tools, to allow direct annotation from raw sequencing data or contigs. For example, FUN4ME [164] integrates three tools: FragGeneScan for gene calling, RAPSearch2 for homology research and the MinPath [165] tool to allow biological pathway reconstruction. Classical, previously mentioned software such as MOCAT2 [129], the web portal MG-RAST v.4 [70], or the IMG/M v.5.0 [69] annotation server, also allow the comparison of metagenomic sequence reads to a reference database of functionally annotated protein families and use homology inference to annotate them.…”
Section: Wgs Metagenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the difficulties noted above, the effort is highly worthwhile in terms of both understanding basic CRISPR/Cas biology and biotechnology applications. In particular, the detailed in silico analysis done here for Type I-E system in E. coli should be extended to diverse CRISPR/Cas systems in other bacterial systems, or even to metagenomic datasets, where tools well suited for such analysis have been developed [50]. Such computational studies should provide a rational starting point for further experiments, where stand-alone computational studies proved to be important for understanding CRISPR/Cas systems [8,12,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%