From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy

Abstract

One of the main functions of geographical indications (GIs) is to provide information and quality to consumers. This, in turn, can generate benefits for producers and stimulate rural development processes, as advocated by European Union (EU) legislation. The objective of the present study is to understand if the theorized effects of GIs on local economic development are supported by empirical evidence. Using a systematic approach, we reviewed the literature on the topic and structured the results of the review adopting a supply chain framework. This allows us to better understand how the effects of GIs are distributed among the chain actors and finally arrive at the local territories where GI products originate. Evidence shows that GIs are actually able to generate value added, especially at the consumer and retailer levels, while the effects on the economic performance of producers are more heterogeneous and dependent on specific local conditions. The review also highlighted some drawbacks in the literature that make it difficult to draw robust conclusions about the actual impact of GI policy at the European level. Therefore, despite the GI tool actually showing good potential for improving local economic conditions, more structured and focused research is needed.

Connecting Urban Food Plans to the Countryside: Leveraging Denver’s Food Vision to Explore Meaningful Rural–Urban Linkages

“…There are several ways to tackle rural inequalities and the disconnect with metropolitan residents (e.g., [15][16][17]). We investigate one possible avenue that has yet to be explored fully in the literature: food systems-driven strategies.…”

Geographical Indication to Build up Resilient Rural Economies: A Case Study from Ghana

“…Finally, the definition of a shared code of practices may encounter some obstacles on farmers of the second and third clusters, in that they evidence risks of exclusion for some local producers. As underlined in the literature [48], difficulties are mainly related to the relatively high costs of adjustment to comply with rules of production.…”

Standard trade marks, geographical indications and provenance branding in Australia: What we can learn from King Island

“…7 That is the case both in legal scholarship and more broadly in the social sciences, including economics, social geography, sociology, agricultural science and management (e.g., Benavente, 2013). Many studies address the question whether registration of a place name as a sui generis GI generates a surplus for the local economy, or more specifically higher margins for farmers within the GI zone (Cei, Defrancesco, & Stefani, 2018;Rangnekar, 2004;Watson, Cooke, Kay, Alward, & Morales, 2017). A common underlying theme of such research is how isolation and challenging conditions of production can be counteracted by a GI system which emphasises the uniqueness of a product and manages to get the value message more directly to consumers.…”